Erik Morales vs Roger Mayweather at 130

[Scott9945]

2 wars in less than 5 months going in to your 50th pro fight is pretty much a gurantee that you're shot. Especially at the lower weights.

And Raheem wasn't screwed in that fight, he was warned like a dozen times about pulling Juarez head and punching and got what he deserved.

Sorry, but your arbitrary definition of being shot is bullspit. And your recount of Juarez-Raheem was about as accurate as your deluded account of Whitaker-Chavez.

[joseph5620]

Sorry, but your arbitrary definition of being shot is bullspit. And your recount of Juarez-Raheem was about as accurate as your deluded account of Whitaker-Chavez.

Nothing but the truth here.

[mehoe]

Morales by decision, if he can take Pac's best shot and Marcos Maidana then I'm sure he can take Rogers.

[Cardinal Buck]

Morales was consistently better, so I'm picking him. The Raheem fight was more the exception to the rule than the rule itself. Roger would make it a good fight though.

[SCtrojansbaby]

Sorry, but your arbitrary definition of being shot is bullspit. And your recount of Juarez-Raheem was about as accurate as your deluded account of Whitaker-Chavez.

Watch the Raheem vs Juarez fight again Raheem gets warned over and over for pulling Juarez head and punching him. Raheem was lucky he didn't also get points taken away for all the flopping he did.

[$Bullsfam$]

Erik Morales by close decision.

Hes not some offensive tank like pac or defensive master like Whitaker. Morales also isn't as sugar ray leonard. He won't make Roger look bad or destroy him. Their probably would be a few knockdowns for each but morales heart and will eeks out a decision.