Originally posted by greynotsoold
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Where do you rate Harry Wills on your HW lists?
Collapse
-
-
On page 300-301 of Roger Kahn's book "A Flame OF Pure Fire: Jack Dempsey and the Roaring '20s", Ray Arcel is quoted as saying, of Wills: "He didn't hit anywhere nears as hard as Dempsey, and he didn't move anywhere near as smoothly as Carpentier. I would rate Wills as a very good journeyman."
On page 269 of the same book Firpo is quoted as saying "The Brown Panther (Wills) is more of a wrestler than a boxer." John Lardner, in his book White Hopes and Other Tigers came to the conclusion that Dempsey would have easily beaten Wills.
Arcel regularly turned to Dempsey's demolition of Willard when asked who he thought was the greatest HW ever, saying that nobody could have beaten Dempsey that day. He was there, and I believe I have read that it was because he had a fighter on the undercard, though perhaps it could've been that he knew somebody on the undercard.
Comment
-
Not top 10 or 15
If you look at Wills record on boxingrec, Paulino Uzcudun easily handled him, & therefore I believe so would Dempsey & Tunney, but it would have been nice if they had actually done it.
Many of Will's bouts against the big 3 black men of the time, Langford, Mcvea & Jeannette, were very late in their careers, apparently the last 3 or so fights with Langford, was when Langford was blind in 1 eye practically & many of Will's bouts against these top guys, most claimed Will's resorted to low blows & other fouls on them.
Will's was big at 6-3 could box & had decent power, in his prime he would have given any of them a good fight, but I doubt he beats any of them in their prime.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steak View PostYes, to both.
Its irritating that Johnson gets so much credit for his wins over green McVea, Jeannette and Langford, while Wills isnt even thrown into the top 10 with him even when he has multiple wins over all of them.Not to mention Wills beat guys like Weinhart and Firpo that were contenders in Dempsey's day.
Not that I would necessarily rate Wills over either of them...but If youre going to rate Johnson or Dempsey in the higher part of your top 10, Wills better be there as well.
Wills beat Fulton and Firpo but both had been destroyed by Dempsey ,Fulton in under half a minute Firpo in 2 rds. Wills beat Madden by decision but a year later Tunney crushed Madden in 3rds.
When Wills was nearing the age Jeannette was when he beat him ,Wills was thrashed by Sharkey and Uzcudun.
I think Wills was the benificiary of a chronological time line, prime Langford,McVey and Jeannette beat him imo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gatling View PostWell we have Ali, Tyson, Foreman, Frazier, Holyfield, Lennox, Holmes, Marciano, Johnson, Louis as a top 10 (no order here)
Then Wladmir, Liston, Patterson, Tunney, Dempsey, Walcott, Norton, etc.
I think he fits in around a top 20 or 25
A young Wills was a sparring partner for Johnson briefly, but was fired because he could not stand the pace. I'm not sold on Wills heart, he appeared to concede rather tamely in his last fights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ivich View PostThat would seem reasonable.
A young Wills was a sparring partner for Johnson briefly, but was fired because he could not stand the pace. I'm not sold on Wills heart, he appeared to concede rather tamely in his last fights.
Comment
-
Wills was ready for his shot at Dempsey, Jack and him were even photographed signing it, but the fight never happened due to lack of interest. Of course a lot of that was due to ugly racism. So Wills truly deserved his title shot, he was at least that good based on his accomplishments, but, could he have actually beaten Dempsey?
In my opinion no. Dempsey enjoyed swinging upward at a taller target and Wills would have been perfectly set for that murderous hook. I haven't watched extensive footage of him (and it doesn't really exist either) but I've seen him against Uzcudan and he really got mauled by a guy who was rugged but overall not a world beater.
I don't think Jack Johnson or Dempsey could ever get handled in the way Uzcudan got to him. Johnson for one was a man who really mastered his craft, an artist with the build of a strongman. He was so rich in boxing skill that he had brute strength but rarely needed to use it. Dempsey had honed instincts and considerable skills of his own, as well as a punch that most simply aren't blessed with.
Wills was a good contender who deserved his title shot but I doubt he could have beaten Dempsey. And he was nowhere near as masterful as Jack Johnson, who was so much better than his peers that he usually fought with a smile on his face.
Comment
-
Comment