2 billion: Who benefits more?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAB5239
    Dallas Cowboys
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 27744
    • 5,040
    • 4,437
    • 73,018

    #1

    2 billion: Who benefits more?

    Larry Homes, Muhammad Ali, Sonny Liston and Joe Louis all have great jabs. If they couldn't have their own jabs than out of the remaining 3 who's jab would suit them best and why?

    I personally feel Holmes jab is best suited for the other 3 overall and would give him Ali's jab. And while Liston's jab is probably the most highly thought of in heavyweight history I don't think it suits any of the others as well as it did himself. Thoughts?
  • Great John L
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 203
    • 9
    • 0
    • 6,335

    #2
    I've read of a lot of people who call Joe Louis the best jabber, but that's if you fight like him. Straight up orthodox, staying largely in a single area and setting up a deadly combo. Same with Liston, though his jab is used more agressively than Joe's. Ali had a pretty good jab. Fast, without question, but not really the kind of jab that makes you feel like somebody threw a brick at your face. Holmes combined strength and power in a jab that could be used by any long armed fighter, agressive or not, mobile or not, and keep your opponent off you and in fear of your jab. So i think Holmes would be the best pick because in my opinion it posseses the most versatility.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP