Is Naseem Hamed vs Kevin Kelly The Most Exciting Featherweight Fight Of All Time?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SCtrojansbaby
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 5951
    • 136
    • 72
    • 12,653

    #11
    If you think Heanrs vs Hagler is the best fight of all time then you have to think Hamed vs Kelly is at least the best featherweight fight.

    Comment

    • deansluk
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Sep 2004
      • 219
      • 17
      • 0
      • 10,254

      #12
      Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby
      If you think Heanrs vs Hagler is the best fight of all time then you have to think Hamed vs Kelly is at least the best featherweight fight.

      this somes it up best , if you prefer 12 round battles the barrera morales type fights r up there , but for a straight slugfest its the best ive seen at the weight

      Comment

      • JAB5239
        Dallas Cowboys
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 27708
        • 5,034
        • 4,436
        • 73,018

        #13
        Chacon-Oliverez is up there. Hell, any fight with Chacon is up there!

        Comment

        • talip bin osman
          spider jerusalem!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 4256
          • 193
          • 65
          • 14,329

          #14
          rogers mtagwa vs tomas villa was more exciting to me...

          it wasnt at any means a technical fight, but man... it was an exciting, really exciting fight...

          Comment

          • Mugwump
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 1653
            • 138
            • 23
            • 10,027

            #15
            Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby
            If you think Heanrs vs Hagler is the best fight of all time then you have to think Hamed vs Kelly is at least the best featherweight fight.
            Why do people draw comparisons between these two bouts? Aside from the early conclusion they really aren't all that close. Not least because Hagler & Hearns knocked lumps out of each other with quality punching from start to finish. Barring the KDs Kelly & Hamed (especially) seemed more obsessed with the cameras.
            Last edited by Mugwump; 06-23-2011, 04:06 PM.

            Comment

            • PrinceNaz88
              THE PRINCE IS FO' REAL
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 3335
              • 94
              • 93
              • 10,820

              #16
              Hamed/Kelley is my personal favourite fight of all time. Great buildup hype, brilliant ring entrance and a very exciting fight. Hamed was a bit sloppy in the fight but it is still great to watch..

              Comment

              • hent
                Banned
                • Jun 2011
                • 205
                • 33
                • 26
                • 261

                #17
                Id agree that it was.

                JMM Vs Pacquiao went 12 rounds because none of them had the punching power of Hamed.

                Comment

                • BigStereotype
                  #1 Knicks Fan
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 6177
                  • 325
                  • 792
                  • 14,139

                  #18
                  Originally posted by hent
                  Id agree that it was.

                  JMM Vs Pacquiao went 12 rounds because none of them had the punching power of Hamed.
                  Maybe not of Hamed, but they were both BIG TIME punches at featherweight. Moreso Pacquiao, but JMM could crack. Check out his KO of Terdsack Jandaeng (honestly, just because I like saying his name). Big, big puncher.

                  Comment

                  • hent
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 205
                    • 33
                    • 26
                    • 261

                    #19
                    Originally posted by BigStereotype
                    Maybe not of Hamed, but they were both BIG TIME punches at featherweight. Moreso Pacquiao, but JMM could crack. Check out his KO of Terdsack Jandaeng (honestly, just because I like saying his name). Big, big puncher.
                    They have decent power sure. Hamed is on a completely diferent level though. None of them would of lasted longer than Kelly did.

                    Comment

                    • BigStereotype
                      #1 Knicks Fan
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 6177
                      • 325
                      • 792
                      • 14,139

                      #20
                      Originally posted by hent
                      They have decent power sure. Hamed is on a completely diferent level though. None of them would of lasted longer than Kelly did.
                      lmao tell that to Marco Antonio Barrea. He punked Hamed and got destroyed by Pacquiao and outboxed (and hurt) by Marquez. Much much better fighter than Kevin Kelly, too.

                      EDIT: Oh, you were just talking in terms of pure punching power. Yeah, Hamed was unreal. Pac and Marquez are both better at actually LANDING that big punch though.
                      Last edited by BigStereotype; 06-25-2011, 11:35 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP