Some say his power is overrated, others say he was the hardest hitter of them all, i heard stories about his power able to lift 1000 pounds is there truth to this? in comparison to the heaviest hitters like Foreman Liston, Tyson and Shavers how hard did he hit
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How hard did Marciano hit compared to heavyweights like Foreman, Liston, Shavers
Collapse
-
How hard did Marciano hit compared to heavyweights like Foreman, Liston, Shavers
21Harder than them all9.52%2As hard as Foreman and Shavers, harder than Liston and Tyson14.29%3Not quite Foreman and Shavers but harder than the rest28.57%6Marciano's power is overarted he did not hit as hard as the above heavyweights47.62%10Tags: None
-
well he was markedly small for a HW champion
he had little arms, a small base, smallish bones (again, in HW champion terms)
he did, however, put everything humanly possible into his punches, so much so that he would literally throw himself to the ground when he got into the sport.
p4p i would say that he's a very hard puncher at the absolute least.
additionally, he was able to knock men out from round 1 to round 15, which tyson, shavers, and some of the other historic great HW punchers could not.
i would rank his power below the men you mentioned merely because of the size
im going off the top of my head, but i don't think rocky had a longer reach than 70 inches. i don't feel like looking it up, but it believe his reach was 68 inches. thats only an inch longer than pacquiao, four inches shorter than mayweather, about seven inches shorter than martinez, etc.
you just cant generate as much leverage and force with a body that small as you can with a body like liston, or foreman, with much longer arms, bigger shoulders, a wider base, more height for leverage, and obviously more weight to transferLast edited by New England; 06-13-2011, 02:34 PM.
-
Originally posted by New England View Postwell he was markedly small for a HW champion
he had little arms, a small base, smallish bones (again, in HW champion terms)
he did, however, put everything humanly possible into his punches, so much so that he would literally throw himself to the ground when he got into the sport.
p4p i would say that he's a very hard puncher at the absolute least.
additionally, he was able to knock men out from round 1 to round 15, which tyson, shavers, and some of the other historic great HW punchers could not.
i would rank his power below the men you mentioned merely because of the size
im going off the top of my head, but i don't think rocky had a longer reach than 70 inches
you just cant generate as much leverage and force with a body that small as you can with a body like liston, or foreman, with much longer arms, bigger shoulders, a wider base, and more height for leverage.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kendom View PostWouldnt small arms be a ind of advantage as you can throw short compact punches hard to avoid?
bigger arms are associated with larger men, obviously
higher weight classes
etc.
harder punchers generally
think of it like bringing a bigger gun to a gunfight
or a larger stick to a stickfight
or sword to a swordfight
are you gonna do more damage winging a dagger around at your opponents breastplate or are you going to go at him with a two handed sword with some length and leverage?Last edited by New England; 06-13-2011, 02:40 PM.
Comment
-
Marciano had ROCKS for fists and could hurt u in any round as NE pointed out which is a huge advantage
Im no size whore but in truth his lack of it hurts him here, all the guys mentioned hit harder imo but p4p he might well best them all
Comment
-
Originally posted by SBleeder View PostYour poll choices make the flawed assumption that Shavers and Foreman hit harder than Liston. I'll give you Shavers, but Liston definitely hit harder than George in my book.
Comment
Comment