I have to give what Ali, Holmes, Norton, and Lyle said about Shavers's power some credibility. Just look at all the punchers they have faced in their careers. Especially Ali. Ali been in the ring with Liston, Bonavena, Williams, Frazier, Foreman, Lyle, Norton, Chuvalo, and Shavers. Those are some very notable punchers. And if Ali said (who I believe had one of the greatest chins in boxing History) that Earnie is the hardest puncher he ever faced, then to me thats saying something.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The brutal power of Earnie Shavers.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by House of Stone View PostShavers had great power but he was NOT a great fighter. I guess his best win was against Norton who went down like a sack of spuds against heavy handed fighters but even guys like Ron Lyle and Jerry Quarry and a well past it Ali had too much for him. His power is undeniable, he put down and hurt some top guys like holmes ... but he didn't beat them. How many on that impressive KO record were bums? How many were real top guys ...
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by It's Ovah View PostJust to address this point separately: I don't think any one physical trait can be said to be categorically above another; it all depends on secondary traits and the style of the fighter you're fighting. But given the choice between just power and chin I'd pick power. No one is immune to the knockout, and sooner or later even the best chins crack (there's also the issue of PD, but we'll leave that to the side for the moment).
Truth be told, you could cut Lennox's power in half and he'd still be a damn good fighter; you double his power and it wouldn't make him much better than he already was. Give him Lennox a chin and he jumps 5 spots on my all-time list (and I suspect a number of others' lists as well).
Fight fans in general are too damn obsessed with power. I know it stems from the fact that punchers are entertaining but entertaining doesn't mean squat when it comes down to the brass tacks of who's a great fighter and who isn't. Who wins and who loses.
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by GF of Boxing View PostI have to give what Ali, Holmes, Norton, and Lyle said about Shavers's power some credibility. Just look at all the punchers they have faced in their careers. Especially Ali. Ali been in the ring with Liston, Bonavena, Williams, Frazier, Foreman, Lyle, Norton, Chuvalo, and Shavers. Those are some very notable punchers. And if Ali said (who I believe had one of the greatest chins in boxing History) that Earnie is the hardest puncher he ever faced, then to me thats saying something.
With Shavers you have such a large number of fighters saying similar things about his power, which lends more weight to the claim, but the fact still remains that Ali, Holmes, Lyle, Tillis and Cobb all survived his best shots and went on to beat him. And in Norton's case I'd wager good money that Cooney hit him a darn sight harder than Shavers did. He certainly had him in a much worse state and did so with fewer punches. I don't doubt that Shavers hit them all pretty damn hard for them to say such things about him in the first place, but I simply can't square their words with the evidence of my own eyes. Expecially in Holmes's case, Tyson dropped him with an almost identical shot to the one that put him down against Shavers. The difference was that Tyson went on to get the stoppage where Shavers did not (and for anyone that wants to bring up Larry's age here, bear in mind that this was the only time he was ever stopped, and that he went on to fight at a high level for another decade more).
I'll always bear in mind what fighters have to say about another fighter's power and take it into consideration when forming my opinion. But I'll never let it be the sole decider. And without the quotes I find that Shavers really doesn't have a strong enough body of stoppages to convince me that he was one of the hardest punchers of all time. Though I do admit that he has a ton of really exciting knockouts.Last edited by nomadman; 06-19-2011, 07:37 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostThat's just it: The best chins don't crack bottom line. You can get stopped by the ref for taking too many punches, stopped on cuts, stopped by an injury, retire in your corner.....no one is immune from THOSE kind of KOs but in those cases the power/chin contest isn't the issue. Watch Hagler walk right through Hearns' best shots, watch Ali take the best of Liston and Foreman (yes both landed on the button a few times) without cracking. Hell, see if you can dig up LaMotta Vs. Satterfield. They've had these matchups throughout boxing history where a fighter with a great chin and no punch was matched up with a fighter with a glass jaw and a big punch: Guess who wins the vast majority of the time? The chin.
Truth be told, you could cut Lennox's power in half and he'd still be a damn good fighter; you double his power and it wouldn't make him much better than he already was. Give him Lennox a chin and he jumps 5 spots on my all-time list (and I suspect a number of others' lists as well).
Fight fans in general are too damn obsessed with power. I know it stems from the fact that punchers are entertaining but entertaining doesn't mean squat when it comes down to the brass tacks of who's a great fighter and who isn't. Who wins and who loses.
A great chin is a great asset just as great power is, but any trait in isolation is going to be more hindrance than good because you'll end up relying on it too much, and like all things in life it's a finite resource.Last edited by nomadman; 06-19-2011, 05:33 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mugwump View PostI asked Earnie Shavers who was the hardest puncher he ever faced when he worked in Liverpool. He surprised me by saying Randall Cobb.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by It's Ovah View PostThat's interesting. Cobb's punches didn't look like they could crack an egg in that fight (an exaggeration, but they really didn't look that hard).
Poet
Comment
Comment