Bernard Hopkins vs Mike McCallum

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pastrano
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2011
    • 2155
    • 65
    • 35
    • 8,983

    #11
    Originally posted by The_Demon
    As Jab already said,he was better defensively,plus he was naturally bigger and a better MW imo,im a huge fan of the Body Snatcher,but i think he would struggle against a guy like Hopkins,who beat a lot of fighters that were better than him in nearly every way
    A better MW?? Did he beat Herol Graham, Steve Collins, Michael Watson and Sumbu Kalambay?? Think not! And he was only an inch and a half taller than Bodysnatcher. And Bodysnatcher's defense was superb! He wasn't easy to hit at all. Hopkins' defense consists of headbutting and rabbitpunching. Well, he has pretty good movement but so did McCallum.

    Comment

    • TBear
      Lords of Boxingscene
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 113272
      • 6,077
      • 12,778
      • 1,665,677,098

      #12
      Originally posted by Pastrano
      A better MW?? Did he beat Herol Graham, Steve Collins, Michael Watson and Sumbu Kalambay?? Think not! And he was only an inch and a half taller than Bodysnatcher. And Bodysnatcher's defense was superb! He wasn't easy to hit at all. Hopkins' defense consists of headbutting and rabbitpunching. Well, he has pretty good movement but so did McCallum.
      He was also outboxed by a prime Kalambay and Toney.

      But I'm not saying you're wrong because this is all our opinions.

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #13
        Hopkins would at worst lose a decision that could go either way IMO.

        Comment

        • $Bullsfam$
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 10253
          • 813
          • 630
          • 46,956

          #14
          Hopkins ring IQ is higher. He's too smart, too savvy. He'd find a way to win this fight on the scorecards.
          Last edited by JAB5239; 05-08-2011, 03:45 PM.

          Comment

          • crold1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 6347
            • 324
            • 122
            • 19,304

            #15
            Originally posted by Natedatpkid
            Hopkins ring IQ is higher. He's too smart, too savvy. He'd find a way to win this fight on the scorecards.

            Pastrano just get the **** outta the history section you troll.
            Their ring IQ's were about equal at peak. McCallum was the more naturally talented of the two, Hopkins probably had more dimensions. They would, at their best, each be the best man either beat and it could go either way. They just missed each other by a couple years. Too bad.

            Comment

            • BigStereotype
              #1 Knicks Fan
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 6177
              • 325
              • 792
              • 14,139

              #16
              Originally posted by Pastrano
              NO WAY! McCallum was just better than Hopkins in every way. What can Hopkins do better than McCallum?? Name one thing.
              Much better defensively. Drop a hand grenade in the ring and I'll give you ten to one that Hopkins avoids it.

              Comment

              • Barn
                TheTartanSoldier
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 8647
                • 675
                • 624
                • 42,074

                #17
                Originally posted by BigStereotype
                Much better defensively. Drop a hand grenade in the ring and I'll give you ten to one that Hopkins avoids it.
                However if you pull the pin...

                Comment

                • BigStereotype
                  #1 Knicks Fan
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 6177
                  • 325
                  • 792
                  • 14,139

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Barnburner
                  However if you pull the pin...
                  B-hop would headbutt your face into a bloody crater before you got the chance.

                  Comment

                  • physiker
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 866
                    • 26
                    • 28
                    • 958

                    #19
                    Fair fight: McCallum.
                    If Taylor could do it 2X, certainly McCallum would.

                    If bad ref allowing Hopkins' fouls, then Hopkins.

                    Comment

                    • ИATAS
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 36648
                      • 2,509
                      • 1,953
                      • 50,835

                      #20
                      [QUOTE=physiker;10508555]Fair fight: McCallum.
                      If Taylor could do it 2X, certainly McCallum would.
                      /QUOTE]

                      you realize hopkins was 40 years old against Taylor, right??

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP