He isn't. In his warped little world anybody fighting pre-1990 was a no-skill caveman who wouldn't have a chance against a "modern" fighter like Tarver :rolleyes9:
He isn't. In his warped little world anybody fighting pre-1990 was a no-skill caveman who wouldn't have a chance against a "modern" fighter like Tarver :rolleyes9:
Poet
Yeah, I've seen his bias a lot, but really ?, I can't see how anyone would choose Tarver over Qawi or Mustapha and "easily" at that ?, I would like too see just how, personally don't see Tarver causing many problems for either of them.
On a side note, I would of loved to see Mustapha vs Qawi, what a war that would of been.
Yeah, I've seen his bias a lot, but really ?, I can't see how anyone would choose Tarver over Qawi or Mustapha and "easily" at that ?, I would like too see just how, personally don't see Tarver causing many problems for either of them.
On a side note, I would of loved to see Mustapha vs Qawi, what a war that would of been.
It's only easy for someone who's twisted myopia insists that the worst fighter of today is better than the best fighter of 20 years ago. Unfortunately that's his take and only terminal ignorance can excuse him.
Comment