Ezzard Charles. How good was he?

[sonnyboyx2]

sounds like something you do agenda man

My Agenda is and always has been to talk Boxing and the history of boxing without being bias or favorable to any particular boxer, i tell it like it is and never waver from that stance yet because i claim that the "Klitschko Brothers are a couple of Lumbering Behemoths" you have taken offence as you are their No1 Nuthugger... i checked out all the threads you have started since you joined the forum and not a single thread is "Boxing History" they are all NSB threads about Klitschko, Froch Etc and current fighters... Your are angry at me because i have exposed them as the worst era of boxers to ever lace gloves on and not in the same league as the great's from the past..

[Toney616]

I only seen Louis, Marciano 1, Marciano 2. Which fights here would people recommend?

[BigStereotype]

he was great

Vernon Forrest was very good
Vargas was very good

does Charles deserve to be compared to Forrest and Vargas ? the words one choses are important

saying a great fighter was very good, that's an understatement, it doesn't make sense

What semantic bull****. You just wanted to talk some ****, just say it. If you want to talk ****, talk ****, but don't gum up a perfectly valid thread and claim to make real points. Take that to the Dome.

Anyway, Ezzard Charles was an excellent fighter. The best word to describe him is sharp - everything he did was very sharp, I think.

[sonnyboyx2]

I only seen Louis, Marciano 1, Marciano 2. Which fights here would people recommend?

Charles vs Reynolds
Charles vs Satterfield
Charles vs Valentino
Charles vs Layne
Charles vs Marshall
Charles vs Holman
Charles vs Maxim
Charles vs Johnson
Charles vs Bivins
Charles vs Norkus
Charles vs Brion

Those should give you a very good idea of how good he was.

[Toney616]

Charles vs Reynolds
Charles vs Satterfield
Charles vs Valentino
Charles vs Layne
Charles vs Marshall
Charles vs Holman
Charles vs Maxim
Charles vs Johnson
Charles vs Bivins
Charles vs Norkus
Charles vs Brion

Those should give you a very good idea of how good he was.

Thanks for this. Ill check them out, if I can find them. Its a shame the Moore fights weren't filmed

[Dan Vida]

Which fights here would people recommend?

Sounds similar to another user(General Zod) that was banned a few months back here.

[Tiozzo]

My Agenda is and always has been to talk Boxing and the history of boxing without being bias or favorable to any particular boxer, i tell it like it is and never waver from that stance yet because i claim that the "Klitschko Brothers are a couple of Lumbering Behemoths" you have taken offence as you are their No1 Nuthugger... i checked out all the threads you have started since you joined the forum and not a single thread is "Boxing History" they are all NSB threads about Klitschko, Froch Etc and current fighters... Your are angry at me because i have exposed them as the worst era of boxers to ever lace gloves on and not in the same league as the great's from the past..

a lot of people here consider me as a Klit hater in fact, you should have taken a look at the threads I have started, because the threads about the Klits were meant to criticise them most of the time

you gonna have to come up with something better

I could add that once again, you expose yourself as a ****ing liar, I have posted in the history section 3 times (about Walcott, Flowers and the cross defense), and there are a lot of threads I have posted in NSB because I didn't take the time to check all the forums in which I could post...

and don't forget you have started all this when you told me ''to go away and watch Ali-Young again''

[Tiozzo]

What semantic bull****. You just wanted to talk some ****, just say it. If you want to talk ****, talk ****, but don't gum up a perfectly valid thread and claim to make real points. Take that to the Dome.

Anyway, Ezzard Charles was an excellent fighter. The best word to describe him is sharp - everything he did was very sharp, I think.

nope

I was upset by the understatement, and I said it

[JAB5239]

a lot of people here consider me as a Klit hater in fact, you should have taken a look at the threads I have started, because the threads about the Klits were meant to criticise them most of the time

you gonna have to come up with something better

I could add that once again, you expose yourself as a ****ing liar, I have posted in the history section 3 times (about Walcott, Flowers and the cross defense), and there are a lot of threads I have posted in NSB because I didn't take the time to check all the forums in which I could post...

and don't forget you have started all this when you told me ''to go away and watch Ali-Young again''

Lets take it easy gentlemen and keep it civil.

[Tiozzo]

Lets take it easy gentlemen and keep it civil.

I'm trying , but this dude is annoying big time