how do you post and it says your not online?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rocky Marciano VS Mike Tyson.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by RockyMarcianofan00now your just being unrealistic i've seen much slower fighters
and he is correct, Marciano did have decent speed, it was more noticable when he didn't have gloves on but see its not he was a slow fighter as much as how he fought
let me put it into terms you can understand- Ali was faster when he was younger cause he was always on his toes, but later he planted his feet and threw hard slower punches
same principle, when Marciano threw a jab it was usually a decent speed but his hook was slower but deadly
the fact is Marciano would swarm, and he had to be pretty good because if he wasn't he would have gotten beaten by counter-punchers
and again, the fact that he never lost, based on his skill level just goes to show the level of competition he fought, nothing else.Ascended likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by NextRockyhow do you post and it says your not online?
Comment
-
Originally posted by NextRockythat ***** in your sig looks like hurricane "bum" carter.
Comment
-
27 wins 12 loses 1 draw. i know your gonna say braddock and all of them had half as many wins and losses but carter didnt even fight the level of competition braddock did. only good people he beat were griffith and ellis. b rated fighters.
(watch butterfly come back with something about marciano fighting old slow past their prime heavyweights with no chins)
Comment
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964ali's powerpunches were still much, much faster than rocky's jabs, that's for sure.
and again, the fact that he never lost, based on his skill level just goes to show the level of competition he fought, nothing else.
as for your other comments i'm not gunna say you have no idea what your talking about- you just have an obscured view
there's a handful of people that could have stood up to Marciano and you can argue it or not, but you can't take 49-0 away from him no matter what way you look at it, because eras that were worse then the 50's are from like the 1800's through like the 1940's and the current era thats about 30 years that were better tehn the 50's
Comment
Comment