Hearns was a freakishly big welterweight?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mickey malone
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 4409
    • 144
    • 101
    • 11,772

    #1

    Hearns was a freakishly big welterweight?

    I'd say he's the biggest welterweight i've ever seen, but some posters disagree and see him as paper thin and delicate at 147..

    What do you think?
    34
    He was freakishly big at 147
    97.06%
    33
    He was thin and delicate at 147
    2.94%
    1

    The poll is expired.

  • Joey Giardello
    #1 Carlos Monzon Fan
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 1273
    • 20
    • 6
    • 7,972

    #2
    Originally posted by mickey malone
    I'd say he's the biggest welterweight i've ever seen, but some posters disagree and see him as paper thin and delicate at 147..

    What do you think?
    yeah he had huge shoulders and back

    Comment

    • JAB5239
      Dallas Cowboys
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 27706
      • 5,034
      • 4,436
      • 73,018

      #3
      Originally posted by Joey Giardello
      yeah he had huge shoulders and back

      He was also 6'1" with a 78" reach.

      Comment

      • Marciano1351
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • May 2010
        • 2
        • 4
        • 0
        • 6,009

        #4
        He was friggin huge.

        Comment

        • Castor_Troy
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 724
          • 244
          • 316
          • 7,564

          #5
          Paul Williams looks bigger

          Comment

          • JAB5239
            Dallas Cowboys
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 27706
            • 5,034
            • 4,436
            • 73,018

            #6
            Originally posted by Castor_Troy
            Paul Williams looks bigger
            He probably is. But could he have made weight and been effective in the days of same day weigh ins?

            Comment

            • Castor_Troy
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 724
              • 244
              • 316
              • 7,564

              #7
              Originally posted by JAB5239
              He probably is. But could he have made weight and been effective in the days of same day weigh ins?
              I dont think so.

              in terms of size alone Paul Williams definately is bigger but Thomas is more effective at the higher weights as of date. His power comes along wherever he goes too.

              Comment

              • 1SILVA
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 1690
                • 41
                • 0
                • 8,440

                #8
                Originally posted by mickey malone
                I'd say he's the biggest welterweight i've ever seen, but some posters disagree and see him as paper thin and delicate at 147..

                What do you think?
                I am almost finished reading his biography written by Brian Hughes. Malone, you should read it. I recommend it for all fans of both the sport and Hearns.

                Comment

                • mickey malone
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 4409
                  • 144
                  • 101
                  • 11,772

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Castor_Troy
                  I dont think so.

                  in terms of size alone Paul Williams definately is bigger but Thomas is more effective at the higher weights as of date. His power comes along wherever he goes too.
                  The only other fighters I can think of who remotely fit the bill at 147 would be Mark Breland, Maurice Blocker and Milton McCrory who were arguably on the delicate side and nowhere near as effective as Hearns.. As pointed out by Joey Giardello in the 1st post, Hearns had back and shoulders, not at all condusive to a beanpole.

                  Comment

                  • mickey malone
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 4409
                    • 144
                    • 101
                    • 11,772

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 1SILVA
                    I am almost finished reading his biography written by Brian Hughes. Malone, you should read it. I recommend it for all fans of both the sport and Hearns.
                    Cheers, I'll make sure i pick it up..

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP