Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did Foreman deserve his title shot in his comeback

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Against Moorer in 1994, Foreman doesn't deserved a shot, coming off a loss to Tommy Morrison, but he's a better choice for Moorer's first title defense than Joe Hipp, who was being considered first.

    before signing to fight Holyfield in 1991, Big George never fought anyone good enough to test him, undefeated european heavyweight Gary Mason and Italian Francisco Damaini were names possible mention as Foreman's opponents.

    Comment


    • #12
      Former Undisputed Champions tend to get preferential treatment.

      Holmes had lost his last two fights and hadn't fought in almost 2 years when he got a shot at Tyson's titles.

      Comment


      • #13
        No,he didn't.but foreman was a big draw back then.His comeback was regarded as a gimmick by most within the boxing industry but the general public took to him.There was alot of money to be made in fighting George foreman.

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP