Originally posted by geribeetus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Marciano is overrated - agree or disagree
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
Lets see, you've said you are not an alt, but you've been posting here for 4 days and you're an expert on who is and who isn't a troll? Yeeeaaahhhh, right!
Just leave, man. That way you won't embarrass yourself again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QuietOne View PostAll I needed was that vulgar PM you sent me and your insulting responses to me in another thread to know that you're a troll.
Just leave, man. That way you won't embarrass yourself again.
This may be gray, but it represents how much of a ***git you are.
The one in response to this, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostAre you talking about the PM I sent you questioning your spelling skills after you sent this message along with your (this always makes me laugh) gray K?
This may be gray, but it represents how much of a ***git you are.
The one in response to this, right?
Get outta' my thread, you idiot.
Comment
-
I could see where he could be overrated, his wins over the greats came at the tail end of their career. Louis in his prime would have done a number on him.
But Marciano's strength came from excellent conditioning and a big heart and that strength is perhaps underrated.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by QuietOne View PostMoore wasn't washed up, but he was a natural light heavyweight.
Age doesn't tell the whole story, in boxing. Charles was past his prime, as evidenced by his performances just prior to and after the Marciano fights.
The first Louis-Walcott fight is largely considered to be a flat-out robbery. Walcott deserved to win that fight. Walcott was even ahead on the scorecards, in the second fight, before the stoppage. By the time Louis fought Marciano, he was old, past his prime and balding.
Comment
Comment