How is Marvin Hagler not the best MW of all time?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • STILL_DETOX
    Undisputed
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 3181
    • 201
    • 359
    • 15,204

    #1

    How is Marvin Hagler not the best MW of all time?

    somebody explain this one to me
    30
    yes
    20.00%
    6
    no
    56.67%
    17
    not sure
    16.67%
    5
    are you ****ing kidding me???
    6.67%
    2
  • The_Demon
    Big dog
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 13603
    • 1,354
    • 888
    • 22,971

    #2
    he is isnt he?

    Comment

    • STILL_DETOX
      Undisputed
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 3181
      • 201
      • 359
      • 15,204

      #3
      i shall add a poll

      Comment

      • CarlosG815
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 3683
        • 240
        • 192
        • 10,304

        #4
        Because SRR is.

        Comment

        • Royalty
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 86
          • 7
          • 0
          • 6,134

          #5
          Not the best. I'd rank either Greb or Robinson as the best. But he's a top 5.

          Comment

          • CarlosG815
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 3683
            • 240
            • 192
            • 10,304

            #6
            MW has had too many great champions. He was a great, but the way SRR dominated it he is the greatest MW of all time.

            I don't think that Marvin Hagler is a better MW than Carlos Monzon, Jake Lamotta, Mickey Walker, or Bernard Hopkins.

            Don't forget Harry Greb's accomplishments. I don't talk too much about him tho as I've only seen short sparring videos.

            Comment

            • Joey Giardello
              #1 Carlos Monzon Fan
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 1273
              • 20
              • 6
              • 7,972

              #7
              It's Carlos Monzon. Due to the fact Hagler lost his title to a former Welterweight, who had, had one fight in the last 6 years, and was suffering from eyesight problems.

              Monzon was Middleweight Champ for 7 years and made 14 defences of his title and reitired champion, something which Hagler didn't do.

              Thats why...............

              Comment

              • CarlosG815
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 3683
                • 240
                • 192
                • 10,304

                #8
                I agree Monzon was a better MW than Hagler, by your logic that would make Hopkins the greatest with 20 defenses.

                Comment

                • Joey Giardello
                  #1 Carlos Monzon Fan
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 1273
                  • 20
                  • 6
                  • 7,972

                  #9
                  Originally posted by CarlosG815
                  I agree Monzon was a better MW than Hagler, by your logic that would make Hopkins the greatest with 20 defenses.
                  Most of them defences were of the IBF title do, virtually all of Monzon's were of the undisputed.

                  And unlike Monzon, Hopkins lost his title to Jermain Taylor. Who in reality lived of them Hopkins wins, and never achieved much since.

                  Monzon would of never lost his title, to someone of Taylor's caliber.

                  Thats why Monzon>Hopkins at 160lb.

                  Comment

                  • Royalty
                    Up and Comer
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 86
                    • 7
                    • 0
                    • 6,134

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Joey Giardello
                    Most of them defences were of the IBF title do, virtually all of Monzon's were of the undisputed.

                    And unlike Monzon, Hopkins lost his title to Jermain Taylor. Who in reality lived of them Hopkins wins, and never achieved much since.

                    Monzon would of never lost his title, to someone of Taylor's caliber.

                    Thats why Monzon>Hopkins at 160lb.
                    Hopkins beat more world champions than Monzon did and reigned as champion for a longer period of time.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP