Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

History revision: miserable "great" Lewis

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
    please show some evidence of this accusation... i have never seen Lewis tanked in any ATG list
    Neither have I, but I have seen him ranked within the top ten hw of all time

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Norton View Post
      But on what criteria this assertion is based - speed, strength, technique? Maybe it is just easier to idealize the retired boxers, because reality will not be able to disillusion us? Moreover, memory is selective and we remember only good moments. Who, for example, now remember that the great Ali was defeated by Ken Norton? Or that Lewis avoided fights with southpaws?

      The past is easier to idealize than the present, which is fresh in memory and constantly subject to inspection by reality with great risk of disappointment. And we don't want to be disappointed so seeks our "heroes" in the past.
      Just speed and technique. It's not necessary to be strong for boxing, although that would come into play in say a wrestling match for instance. But I do also factor in endurance, heart, chin, courage... you name it.

      Lewis fought in a very poor heavyweight era, almost as poor as the one we are experiencing today. There aren't enough decent boxers around, and the fights are not frequent enough to instil any level of expertise. The heavyweights are all too big, and would be murdered by any decent middleweight from the 1920s through to the 1950s. This is not the era of the cheese champions, it's the era of the giant size tomato cans.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by EzzardFan View Post
        Just speed and technique. It's not necessary to be strong for boxing, although that would come into play in say a wrestling match for instance. But I do also factor in endurance, heart, chin, courage... you name it.

        Lewis fought in a very poor heavyweight era, almost as poor as the one we are experiencing today. There aren't enough decent boxers around, and the fights are not frequent enough to instil any level of expertise. The heavyweights are all too big, and would be murdered by any decent middleweight from the 1920s through to the 1950s. This is not the era of the cheese champions, it's the era of the giant size tomato cans.
        I disagree. Lewis's real reigns came at the end of a very good era. The Heavyweight division of the 1990s, with some occasional potholes, was one of the best decades the Heavyweights ever saw and Lewis was in the thick of that. The dropoff was happening big time by 2001-02, and has gotten worse every year, but most of his career was contested in a hot period.

        Comment


        • #14
          Lennox Lewis Explains Why He Never Gave Vitali Klitschko A Rematch

          Another pathetic excuse from Lewis. He has no courage nor honor.

          "Lewis spoke about how he is “always” asked why he never came back to fight Klitschko again, and he gave his reasons for not returning to give us the fight some fans (and Vitali himself) have obsessed about ever since 2003.

          “People always ask me why I never came back to fight [Vitali] Kitschko [again],” Lewis said to Sky Sports. “The reason was, I had no hunger for Klitschko - he never said he wanted to eat my children, he never bit me in the leg (as former opponent Mike Tyson had done). He never did anything like that.

          “So, when it came time for me to see if I should fight Klitschko again, I thought - at my worst, at my worst! I beat Klitschko and look what I did to his face! I was at my worst - just think [what would’ve happened] if I’d trained just a little bit harder. I didn’t need to fight him again.”

          Indeed, fans do tend to forget that Lewis, who had originally trained for a fight with Kirk Johnson the June night he met late replacement Klitschko, had only a limited amount of time to get ready for “Dr Iron Fist” and his style of fighting. Yet still Lewis busted up Klitschko and won via TKO.

          Lewis was asked if he feels he would have won had the fight not been stopped due to the quite horrific cuts Klitschko suffered in that great action fight.

          “Of course,” Lewis answered. “What I did to Klitschko was, I brought him into the deep water. After five rounds, that was it - the same as it was with Frank Bruno. That’s the problem today with the heavyweights, they only train for a five round fight, and that’s why the Klitschkos beat them, because they are in such great condition.”

          Comment


          • #15
            Pathetic excuse ?, but he's right.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by NChristo View Post
              Pathetic excuse ?, but he's right.
              He just comes up with excuses again. Watch the video and listen to commentators and Larry Merchant at the thread start. It differs from what Lewis tells now.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by NChristo View Post
                Pathetic excuse ?, but he's right.
                This, only a nutthugger would call that a pathetic excuse. Anyone with eyes can see that the fight was even on the cards, and Vitali was absolutely out on his feet before the final bell sounded. Whereas Lewis....well he had his knees buckle in the second but was still their, still fighting just as hard as Vitali was. No contest. Maybe the Vitali of today could pull it off, but not that joke of a fighter he was back then.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Norton View Post
                  He just comes up with excuses again. Watch the video and listen to commentators and Larry Merchant at the thread start. It differs from what Lewis tells now.
                  What was Joe Louis's excuse for losing to young Marciano? What was Ali's excuse for losing to a younger Larry Holmes?

                  Lennox actually won his last fight against a young, prime ATG, and all he gets is complaints about what he said in the post fight interview.

                  Do you realize no other Heavyweight has gone out on top in the manner Lennox did? The guy he sparked up ended up becoming the future dominant champ of the next era. Lennox at his worst was on par with the young hungry challenger at his best.

                  Its never been done in boxing, probably never will again.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by JoeyZagz View Post
                    What was Joe Louis's excuse for losing to young Marciano? What was Ali's excuse for losing to a younger Larry Holmes?

                    Lennox actually won his last fight against a young, prime ATG, and all he gets is complaints about what he said in the post fight interview.

                    Do you realize no other Heavyweight has gone out on top in the manner Lennox did? The guy he sparked up ended up becoming the future dominant champ of the next era. Lennox at his worst was on par with the young hungry challenger at his best.

                    Its never been done in boxing, probably never will again.
                    I agree, look at what he did to ATG Vitali Klitschko in his prime while at his worst (Lewis' worst, but still awesome).

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by JoeyZagz View Post

                      Lennox actually won his last fight against a young, prime ATG, and all he gets is complaints about what he said in the post fight interview.
                      Vitali is an ATG ?, .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP