Who was the better puncher?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAB5239
    Dallas Cowboys
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 27713
    • 5,034
    • 4,436
    • 73,018

    #1

    Who was the better puncher?

    Who the better puncher Earnie Shavers or Wilfredo Gomez? Shavers was 74-14-1(68) with a 76.4 ko%. Gomez was 44-3 (42) with a 87.5 ko%. In The Rings top 100 punchers, shavers ranked 10th, while Gomez was at 13th.

    Vote and discuss.
    3
    Earnie Shavers
    33.33%
    1
    Wilfredo Gomez
    66.67%
    2

    The poll is expired.

  • TheGreatA
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 14143
    • 633
    • 271
    • 21,863

    #2
    For sheer raw power, Shavers. In most other areas Wilfredo Gomez was the better puncher, but not necessarily a harder hitter, as big of a puncher he was at 122. Still, it was mostly his overall ability as a boxer-puncher which is why he managed to stop almost all of his opponents, not pure power. When he got away from his boxing ability, he became a lesser fighter and he never truly carried his power up to 126 pounds.

    Shavers on the other hand always relied on his ability to take out his opponent with one punch and skill-wise was not on the level of Gomez. Everything he ever accomplished was mostly because he could punch and little else.

    Comment

    • JAB5239
      Dallas Cowboys
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 27713
      • 5,034
      • 4,436
      • 73,018

      #3
      Originally posted by TheGreatA
      For sheer raw power, Shavers. In most other areas Wilfredo Gomez was the better puncher, but not necessarily a harder hitter, as big of a puncher he was at 122. Still, it was mostly his overall ability as a boxer-puncher which is why he managed to stop almost all of his opponents, not pure power. When he got away from his boxing ability, he became a lesser fighter and he never truly carried his power up to 126 pounds.

      Shavers on the other hand always relied on his ability to take out his opponent with one punch and skill-wise was not on the level of Gomez. Everything he ever accomplished was mostly because he could punch and little else.

      I always thought Gomez was very underrated as a boxer because of his high ko%. Very skilled fighter.

      Comment

      • TheGreatA
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 14143
        • 633
        • 271
        • 21,863

        #4
        Originally posted by JAB5239

        I always thought Gomez was very underrated as a boxer because of his high ko%. Very skilled fighter.
        I'd say he was at his most skilled when he was just 19-21 years old. Great footwork.

        Unfortunately he turned into too much of a brawler/puncher later in his career.

        Comment

        • Jim Jeffries
          rugged individualist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 20741
          • 1,376
          • 2,868
          • 54,838

          #5
          Originally posted by TheGreatA
          I'd say he was at his most skilled when he was just 19-21 years old. Great footwork.

          Unfortunately he turned into too much of a brawler/puncher later in his career.
          I was watching Kostya Tszyu in the ams against Vernon Forrest. Seems like he did the same thing later in his career, relied more and more on power while his boxing skills atrophied.

          Comment

          • roxy
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 6792
            • 3,458
            • 4,038
            • 14,530

            #6
            I always thought Gomez got his knockouts because he outclassed fighters. Gomez was a great boxer at 122 but Shavers was a much harder puncher.

            Comment

            • Silencers
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 21957
              • 505
              • 235
              • 32,983

              #7
              Gomez placed his punches much better than Shavers. Shavers was the harder hitter pound for pound as well as literally but Gomez knew how to make his punches count.

              Comment

              • mickey malone
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 4409
                • 144
                • 101
                • 11,772

                #8
                Originally posted by JAB5239
                Who the better puncher Earnie Shavers or Wilfredo Gomez? Shavers was 74-14-1(68) with a 76.4 ko%. Gomez was 44-3 (42) with a 87.5 ko%. In The Rings top 100 punchers, shavers ranked 10th, while Gomez was at 13th.

                Vote and discuss.
                P4P, Gomez 4 sure, was the better puncher.. So was Ketchell, Jenkins, Zarate and Jackson in my opinion..

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP