Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
ruiz and moorer should learn more about it
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
two of them he destroyed quickly with ease but the bottom line is "destroyed".
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
and yes , mccall was also more muscular than williamson at that time but by a much smaller margin than the 250 to 210.
fat doesn't help you that much.
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
if he really is a top5 , it is more of an evidence about the ranking entity and the current weakness at 201+.
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
louis was 21 against a smaller opponent than himself.
and i really do not care if he was 3 lbs heavier , because he still was bigger than schmelling.
21 is not 19 , it is growth time and critical difference.
Originally posted by TheGreatA
View Post
schmelling was maybe still good but damaged goods by that time.
this sport is harmful.
Leave a comment: