Originally posted by donkim
View Post
We've already gone through all the other topics that you've mentioned,there's no point in dragging up the same repetitive discussions to hear your same repetitive arguments.
Are you talking about the same repetitive questions you consistently duck?
It's well documented that braddock suffered from arthritis,you can look up the details yourself as it isn't difficult to find.

Now for some reality. You said Braddock was "heavily sedated" for the Louis fight. So either you don't know the difference between a pain medication and a sedative or you're lying again. Which is it, ****** or liar?
Is claiming that "Louis was beaten by a technically better fighter in Schmeling" really an accusation?
Is not answering my question on why Schmeling couldn't make it out of the first round in the rematch a duck by you?
Comment