Worst Decision?
Collapse
-
And yet there was no dispute over the decision given to Vargas,do you not understand this moron?
It's never been debatated to the lengths that other fights have because most saw it as a decisive victory for Vargas.
Compubox is a flawed and nobody but you takes it seriously.
Diaz had built up a an early lead already.In case you had forgotten, fights are scored on a round by round basis and by the time Malignaggi had climbed his way back into the fight and won the vast majority of the latter rounds(except the last round)he had already given always almost half of the ight.
I don't see how you practically admitting that Pacquiao did nothing to earn the decision over Marquez in their rematch does anything to support your argument(whatever that is).
Do an awful lot of stalking,don't ya lad?
Nice to see that you discovered spell checker,makes a difference,doesn't it?
Anyone who has seen Mayweather's fight with Augustus will tell you that Augustus received a one sided beating.There's no need to start gushing blood out of your vag there missy.
I really don't care to know your daydream's sweetheart,none of this is relevant to this topic.
Take the time out to read my actual username.
Stalking? I never quoted one of your messages on NSB, since i don't care much for trolls, but you called me out and i responded. You can't fire shots and not expect some retribution.
But you are the one who quoted over something is that quite trivial. I never called Quartey vs Vargas a bad decision. I also never thought SRL vs Hagler was a bad decision; thought SRL won. But its still controversial since many thought Hagler won.
I don't always agree with Harold Letterman but he had Pac winning 115-112. I had it even. I go by the 10 point system, that is why i had JMM winning the first fight 113-112, even if i scored the first RD 10-6 due to the 3 KD's. I thought JMM won 8 RDS in the first fight, I had himt winning 6 in the second and one even. Forget me, put a public opinion poll and ask which fight was a worse decision?
Daydreams? Anything i say can be corroborated and proven. What needs no corroboration is your image as a troll who disagrees just to disagree, who insults just to try to bring his low self esteem up. You are the archtype classic Cyberbully. I have no issues DonnA kin with difference of opinion. There are many posters i disagree with but still respect due to sticking topic and not personal.Comment
-
And yet you are very familar with many of the previous posts that I had made.
Paul Williams wasn't involved in the topic and yet you decided to bring him up for some odd reason.
I never even mentioned Leonard-Hagler in this conversation.You brought up Vargas-Quartey as being controversial and yet there has never been any debate on who deserved the decision as Vargas has always been viewed as the clear winner.
Daydreams? Anything i say can be corroborated and proven. What needs no corroboration is your image as a troll who disagrees just to disagree, who insults just to try to bring his low self esteem up. You are the archtype classic Cyberbully. I have no issues DonnA kin with difference of opinion. There are many posters i disagree with but still respect due to sticking topic and not personal.
Yes,daydreams.
If your post wasn't so ridiculous and farfetched I'd have a good mind to spend a great deal of time ridiculing you for the sad act that you are.
Jog on.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment