Who was better?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Benncollinsaad
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 4210
    • 98
    • 40
    • 4,773

    #1

    Who was better?

    Oscar De La Hoya or Julio Cesar Chavez? I personally believe that, although Chavez was a very tough guy and excellent fighter, he wouldn't do much better against Oscar in his prime than he did in their two fights. After all, in the first fight he was only 34 I believe. And the effect of Oscar's power on him was clearly displayed and proven. I'm not sure if Chavez ever fought anybody with Oscar's power AND quickness. Really, has he ever beaten a really big puncher?

    Anyway, Oscar had all the advantages, the height, the speed and a better jab. And he hit as hard as Chavez.
  • StarshipTrooper
    Anti-Fascist, Anti-Bigot
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 17917
    • 1,180
    • 1,344
    • 26,849

    #2
    Originally posted by Benncollinsaad
    Really, has he ever beaten a really big puncher?
    Edwin Rosario.

    Comment

    • Benncollinsaad
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 4210
      • 98
      • 40
      • 4,773

      #3
      Originally posted by poet682006
      Edwin Rosario.
      I've heard of him...when was that?

      Comment

      • The Number 6
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 102
        • 1
        • 2
        • 6,158

        #4
        De La Hoya gets the nod for me the guy had everything. He mixed it up with the better opposition aswell

        Comment

        • larry x
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 10715
          • 499
          • 247
          • 11,556

          #5
          chavez was 34..but had over 100 fights..he was battle ridden by the time he fought oscar..but who was better???im not sure..

          Comment

          • 1SILVA
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 1690
            • 41
            • 0
            • 8,440

            #6
            Originally posted by Benncollinsaad
            Oscar De La Hoya or Julio Cesar Chavez? I personally believe that, although Chavez was a very tough guy and excellent fighter, he wouldn't do much better against Oscar in his prime than he did in their two fights. After all, in the first fight he was only 34 I believe. And the effect of Oscar's power on him was clearly displayed and proven. I'm not sure if Chavez ever fought anybody with Oscar's power AND quickness. Really, has he ever beaten a really big puncher?

            Anyway, Oscar had all the advantages, the height, the speed and a better jab. And he hit as hard as Chavez.
            Excellent point. I feel Chavez was taylor made for De La Hoya

            Comment

            • The Noose
              AKA Bologna Panini
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Aug 2004
              • 12082
              • 1,040
              • 826
              • 44,455

              #7
              Chavez was better overall. But Oscar had the style to beat him.

              Yet if Chavez was in his prime, the last few rounds would have been trouble for Oscar.

              Comment

              • The Noose
                AKA Bologna Panini
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Aug 2004
                • 12082
                • 1,040
                • 826
                • 44,455

                #8
                Originally posted by poet682006
                Edwin Rosario.
                Add Jose Luis Ramirez to that.

                Originally posted by The Number 6
                De La Hoya gets the nod for me the guy had everything. He mixed it up with the better opposition aswell
                Oscar was beaten by better opposition. He lost most of his big fights.

                Comment

                • Clegg
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 24674
                  • 3,726
                  • 2,307
                  • 233,274

                  #9
                  Chavez was the better boxer and has the better resume.

                  Oscar won more belts in more weightclasses, but they basically give out those ABC titles as raffle prizes these days. I heard some kid even won one last week just by opening a Kinder Surprise.

                  Comment

                  • RightCross94
                    Banned
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 2899
                    • 158
                    • 150
                    • 3,933

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Clegg
                    Chavez was the better boxer and has the better resume.

                    Oscar won more belts in more weightclasses, but they basically give out those ABC titles as raffle prizes these days. I heard some kid even won one last week just by opening a Kinder Surprise.
                    Yeah, he'll be unifying against Amir Khan in eight weeks. Personally I think he has a punchers chance.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP