Originally posted by poet682006
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do The Evolution...
Collapse
-
Originally posted by VibesMan View PostIn most sports the athletes of today deliver significantly increased measures than that of their 60/70/80s counterparts.
Think Usain Bolt and what he'd do to Carl Lewis over 100m.
Compare the speed of serve of, say, Rod**** to Bjorg and so and so on.
We know just how great SRR, Homicide Hank, Ali et al were but my question is this.
If we assume athletes today are stronger, faster and better prepared than their predeccessors how much does that make up for raw talent?
People react like you've just shat in their coffee should you suggest a modern day middle takes down Hagler but could it be that Evolution gives a moderatley talented fighter an advantage over a great from yesteryear?
some of it's true some of it isn't
I can't say the Hw's have improved because this generation actually lost to last generation.
there are some great new fighters though that can ****/beat some great older fighters as well.
I haven't really seen any advancement from the 70's and on. We have seen some new styles emerge but that's about it.
I think the sad thing is boxing's best athletes have always come from poverty, or have had reasons to drive themselves. The USA simply isn't as poor as it once was so the only good fighters are coming from other countries.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GJC View PostWell it does sound weird in a way it takes 1000's of years to evolve but like I said I'm sure my grandson must have half a foot on my grandfather and I would say that he is the norm rather than the exception.
Poet
Comment
Comment