Why the Mayweather-Pacquiao conflict can’t be resolved

[JeBron Lamez]

if one believes Mayweather was the “master boxer” of his era this is irreconcilable with the view of Pacquiao as a risk-taking entertainer.

No tf it isn't, wtf lol.

[JeBron Lamez]

The fight between these two was nothing. Neither man was willing to risk enough to win. The decision could have gone either way

It was a boxing match, one man did win & errrm no tf it couldn't have wtf lol.

[Coverdale]

No tf it isn't, wtf lol.

It was a boxing match, one man did win & errrm no tf it couldn't have wtf lol.

Thank you for these deep and insightful responses. You can return to the NSB now.

[JeBron Lamez]

Thank you for these deep and insightful responses. You can return to the NSB now.

My responses were perfect direct contradictions of some of the garbage being typed here.

I notice you didn't actually offer any response relevant to my calling you on your bullshït, patently untrue & barely sensical opinion that:
"if one believes Mayweather was the “master boxer” of his era this is irreconcilable with the view of Pacquiao as a risk-taking entertainer."

[Coverdale]

My responses were perfect direct contradictions of some of the garbage being typed here.

I notice you didn't actually offer any response relevant to my calling you on your bullshït, patently untrue & barely sensical opinion that:
"if one believes Mayweather was the “master boxer” of his era this is irreconcilable with the view of Pacquiao as a risk-taking entertainer."

It's always the rude/abusive ones who expect to be addressed properly when it suits them.

Try talking like a respectful adult and you'll get an appropriate response. Otherwise I'll just assume you're here to have an argument like the assorted other imbeciles who plague this forum.

Have a pleasant day/evening, won't you?

[JeBron Lamez]

It's always the rude/abusive ones who expect to be addressed properly when it suits them.

Try talking like a respectful adult and you'll get an appropriate response. Otherwise I'll just assume you're here to have an argument like the assorted other imbeciles who plague this forum.

Have a pleasant day/evening, won't you?

Glad you've admitted you were typing complete nonsense & didn't try to defend your unfounded, made up bullshït 'opinion'.

[Coverdale]

Glad you've admitted you were typing complete nonsense & didn't try to defend your unfounded, made up bullshït 'opinion'.

Boring and blocked.

[JeBron Lamez]

Boring and blocked.

Blocked from what, ho?

[JeBron Lamez]

Boring and blocked.

Not blocked from this thread or any other loooool.

[Nash out]

The reason the fight was not entertaining was because 38-year-old, past-prime Mayweather, beat prime 36-year-old Manny 118-110 and it was not close or exciting. Anyone giving Manny anything other than R4 and R6, both of which he won wide, does not know how to score boxing. Style-wise TBE Mayweather is a nightmare for Manny, just as Marquez was, and Marquez had a case of winning of 4 of the Marquez vs Pacquiao fights. Nash out - His Majesty

Jake Paul is the Face of Boxing, Nash out is the Voice of Boxing. If Nash talks, pull up a chair, crack open a beer, listen and learn.