Roy Jones Jr.'s Legacy
Collapse
-
-
If by destroyed you mean winning the majority of the rounds, then yes. If you think that Eubank was serious then I don't know what to tell you.
The difference between Hopkins and Calzaghe is that one fought good competition and the other not.
It's funny how you call Hopkins the coward when he was virtually considered an old man and still fighting young, good fighters. While your hero Calzaghe's biggest fight was against a completely faded Roy Jones Jr. As soon as a new champion who actually posed a thread to Calzaghe came up and challenged him, he retired.You serious man?? If you are, then I don't think there is no use in debating with you anymore.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Wow, IDK where to even start with the biased hate on RJJ in this thread. First I would have him top 20 range ATG, no way anyone should have him past top 30. I saw more than once posters saying he never beat Tarver. Maybe you should actually watch the fight and see he won 8 rounds to 4 in the first fight. I really was wondering why they were even having a rematch when it was announced, because Jones so clearly won. Lastly, James Toney blowing up in weight in between fights in no way diminishes Roy's win over him. It is not Jones's obligation to regulate Toney's weight, and being weight drained when you are a champion and know you have to make weight to defend your title is never and excuse for a loss.Comment
-
This section of the forum is for people who actually know stuff about boxing and who don't base their opinions on who their favorite fighters are.Comment
-
Thats EXACTLY what you are doing! We all know you are a B-Hop nuthugger and thug-wannabe, so do us all a favor-zip up.
Youre a VERY biased guy and a hater. You are hating on Calzaghe because he beat your gangsta-rolemodel B-Hop.Comment
Comment