New information is good: So it not only came out after they split, you identify it as the cause of the separation. That adds to it validity making it more interesting.
Sorry I believe you do have an obligation. I am not suggestimg deep research, but mere time placement of a quote, when it makes a profound claim, is important. And I know you know that.
Throwing out quotes and leaving them open to interpretation by an limited-educated listener will result in wrong extrapolations.
Not saying deep research, not even saying post the proof. (I am taking every word you write at face value.)
But I am saying a ittle more effort protecting against unintended bias would be nice.
You have some obligation to 'history' to offer a touch of context to your quotes.
or so I say
- - Probably most of boxing history is of he said/she said nature because boxing as a sport has always been poorly organized and regulated.
Comment