Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jeffries-Johnson a different question . . .

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post

    New information is good: So it not only came out after they split, you identify it as the cause of the separation. That adds to it validity making it more interesting.

    Sorry I believe you do have an obligation. I am not suggestimg deep research, but mere time placement of a quote, when it makes a profound claim, is important. And I know you know that.

    Throwing out quotes and leaving them open to interpretation by an limited-educated listener will result in wrong extrapolations.

    Not saying deep research, not even saying post the proof. (I am taking every word you write at face value.)

    But I am saying a ittle more effort protecting against unintended bias would be nice.

    You have some obligation to 'history' to offer a touch of context to your quotes.

    or so I say

    - - Probably most of boxing history is of he said/she said nature because boxing as a sport has always been poorly organized and regulated.

    Comment

    Working...
    X
    TOP