Are we just going to ignore the fact that Carl Froch didn't really beat Andre Dirrell?

[Rockin']

In the books it's still an L no matter how many videos you post. Let it go..............Rockin'

[Rockin']

Im a Calzaghe fan

Do slapping/cuffing punches impress you? They must............Rockin'

[QueensburyRules]

The "runner/stinker" put more combinations on Carl Froch's face than the other way around. Froch did manage to get in some good wrestling moves but unfortunately that is an entirely different sport.

You obviously didn't watch the fight, much like you never saw tape of Sugar Ray Robinson vs Willie Pep. So I'll post some highlights for you:

- -Pascal put up a decent, close fight, not Andre the Fluffy Whoopee Cushion.

Dirrell and his criminal corner eliminated hisself from any further viewing by myself. I watch fights, not runner/stinkers. His bro Anthony the real fighter of the family ain't no great shakes but a decent title showing that would be look better if he didn't have L' Odeur Infecte bro tainting the family name...

[ShoulderRoll]

In the books it's still an L no matter how many videos you post. Let it go..............Rockin'

There are a lot of results in the books that the fans know weren't really so.

Bradley-Pacquiao 1, Chavez vs Whitaker, and so on.

This fight was one of them. Dirrell made Froch look pedestrian and should have gotten the W for it.

[siablo14]

Went back to watch this fight. I saw that I watched it already. I went to read the comments. I saw that I scored it 117-111 for Dirrell.

[siablo14]

There are a lot of L's in the books that the fans know weren't really so.

Bradley-Pacquiao 1, Chavez vs Whitaker, and so on.

This fight was one of them. Dirrell made Froch look pedestrian and should have gotten the W for it.

GGG-Canelo 1, Wilder-Fury 1

[Rockin']

There are a lot of results in the books that the fans know weren't really so.

Bradley-Pacquiao 1, Chavez vs Whitaker, and so on.

This fight was one of them. Dirrell made Froch look pedestrian and should have gotten the W for it.

That is your opinion, but in the books it's still an L for Dirrell, same with Whitaker.

I know where you are coming from but it is still an L, get over it.

I lost a ****ty decision as a pro at the Palace, but you don't hear me crying about it................Rockin'

[ShoulderRoll]

That is your opinion, but in the books it's still an L for Dirrell, same with Whitaker.

I know where you are coming from but it is still an L, get over it.

I lost a ****ty decision as a pro at the Palace, but you don't hear me crying about it................Rockin'

It's my opinion and I'm giving it on a thread started by someone else where others are giving their opinion.

That's what the forums are for, Rockin'.

[Rockin']

It's my opinion and I'm giving it on a thread started by someone else where others are giving their opinion.

That's what the forums are for, Rockin'.

But these forums are unable to erase the Ls from bad decisions. So just get over it and carry on.............Rockin'

[QueensburyRules]

There are a lot of results in the books that the fans know weren't really so.

Bradley-Pacquiao 1, Chavez vs Whitaker, and so on.

This fight was one of them. Dirrell made Froch look pedestrian and should have gotten the W for it.

- -Dirrell awarded the Flint Stinker Emeritus lifetime title, meaning at any point in his life he can come and claim the main title...only in boxing, folks...