Originally posted by Obama
View Post
Due to the nature of boxing and the constant churn of contenders there's always someone a fighter fails to meet. You can go through virtually anyone's career and pick out a few they didn't face. What's more important is what was going on when they were supposed to meet and who they were facing instead.
Holmes and Frazier’s careers never really intersected. Holmes was not a relevant heavy by the time Frazier retired, and in fact didn’t fight any kind of ranked contender til Shavers in ‘78. In any case, I very much doubt King would have risked Larry against someone like Frazier at that point in his career. Incidentally, you can make a much longer list of prime contenders Holmes failed to meet in his era…
Okay I suppose he could have fought Terrell and Patterson in the 60s/early 70s but given his schedule in that time frame included Ali, Bonavena, Quarry, Mathis, Ellis, Machen and Chuvalo, it’s unlikely he was avoiding them. Floyd and Terrell were hardly two of boxing’s great duckees.
I know Shavers’ current rep is that both Foreman and Frazier ducked him, but the reality is he wasn’t even ranked in the top ten for much of the 70s. He first cracked the top ten in late ‘73 (World Boxing Magazine) by which time Frazier-Ali II had already been signed. He then promptly lost to Quarry, who subsequently fought Frazier, and within a year had also lost to Bob Stallings. Shavers wasn’t a big factor in the division again til Frazier had retired.
A Lyle fight in 74-75 would have been more meaningful than the Ellis rematch, so I agree on that. Even so, Frazier’s post-title resume of Ali (twice), Foreman, Bugner and Quarry is not the resume of someone ducking significant challenges.
Comment