Norton vs Holyfield

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • them_apples
    Lord
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 9764
    • 1,181
    • 900
    • 41,722

    #1

    Norton vs Holyfield

    for a slight change on this forum

    2 ripped athletes in elite physical shape, who wins.

    a lot of people will probably pick Holyfield, but let's not forget Norton went 12 with Ali and Holmes, so by the looks of it, if you aren't a huge puncher - he is a good boxer. I see this going 12 rounds.
  • res
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2006
    • 4219
    • 150
    • 4
    • 12,056

    #2
    Norton was smart, I see it going 12 rounds as well but I'd still pick Holyfield.

    Comment

    • LondonRingRules
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2005
      • 1581
      • 133
      • 0
      • 8,332

      #3
      Originally posted by them_apples
      for a slight change on this forum

      2 ripped athletes in elite physical shape, who wins.
      ** The real real deal of course, Norton.

      Much higher workrate and stamina and a natural heavy. Norton was incredibly consistent and only vulnerable to big punchers whereas EH was pretty much up and down after beating a bloated Buster as far his heavy performances go. Not a big puncher, so he'd have a puncher's chance, but Norton can match him in power as well.

      Comment

      • Southpaw Stinger
        Trousersnake Fondler
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2005
        • 25730
        • 947
        • 536
        • 37,838

        #4
        Norton, decision. Poor Norton gets forgotten a lot of the time because he didn't like taking sots from Foreman, Shavers and Cooney. I'm sure everyone can understand why.

        Comment

        • MR.CHICANITO
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Aug 2007
          • 973
          • 92
          • 2
          • 7,449

          #5
          Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
          Norton, decision. Poor Norton gets forgotten a lot of the time because he didn't like taking sots from Foreman, Shavers and Cooney. I'm sure everyone can understand why.
          i think holyfield kicks his butt all day long i see evander out boxing him from the outside and catching him coming in wide open

          Comment

          • Southpaw Stinger
            Trousersnake Fondler
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2005
            • 25730
            • 947
            • 536
            • 37,838

            #6
            Originally posted by MR.CHICANITO
            i think holyfield kicks his butt all day long i see evander out boxing him from the outside and catching him coming in wide open

            Norton is a hard man to out-box. Ali and Holmes had a handful and they were the boxing gods.

            Comment

            • them_apples
              Lord
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2007
              • 9764
              • 1,181
              • 900
              • 41,722

              #7
              Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
              Norton is a hard man to out-box. Ali and Holmes had a handful and they were the boxing gods.
              Yea Norton is very underated, he could box all night. He gave a Prime Holmes hell.

              Comment

              • Classic
                Amateur
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 9
                • 0
                • 0
                • 6,017

                #8
                Nice matchup

                Norton's weakness was punchers. Against guys who could crack, he'd just crumble (Foreman, Shavers, Cooney, and rumor has it Frazier used to **** him around the gym pretty easily too). Fortunately for him, Holyfield is not a known heavyweight puncher.

                This one is a tough one and could go either way. Norton fought in the golden era of heavies while the crop of big boys in Holyfield's time wasn't bad either.

                Still, just given his work rate, his toughness, strength, and underrated boxing skills, i gotta go with Evander here. Holyfield UD in a barn burner.

                Comment

                • Silencers
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 21957
                  • 505
                  • 235
                  • 32,983

                  #9
                  This would be a really good fight, I wonder if Holyfield could have pushed Norton back because Norton was not nearly as good going backward as he was going forward, if Norton manages to stand his ground and move forward, I'd pick him to win a decision, if Holyfield manages to push Norton back then I think Holyfield would win. Good fight.

                  Comment

                  • StarshipTrooper
                    Anti-Fascist, Anti-Bigot
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 17917
                    • 1,180
                    • 1,344
                    • 26,849

                    #10
                    Norton's style was developed to defuse slick boxers like Ali and it worked very well; it's drawback was it left him completely wide open to aggressive punchers that came straight at him. Holyfield fits into neither of those catagories which makes this an intruiging matchup. Call it a close decision for Holyfield where Evander out-works Norton down the stretch a'la the first Qawi fight.

                    Poet

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP