I would like to ask your opinion on something.
Why was Sonny Liston considered invincible after destroying Floyd Patterson? Nothing on Floyd's resume (other than a win over Archie Moore) points to the fact that he was a world beater.
As a champion ,I dare say ,he was protected from opponents considered dangerous. I he was a great offensive fighter but he was very easy to hit. If Ingemar could tee off on him at will, why in the world would anyone be suprised that he got demolished my Liston?
Not taking anything away from either fighter, but it doesn't look like a lopsided victory by Sonny Liston would be that shocking.Nor does it look like a victory over Floyd Patterson would signify the coming of an invincible champion.
Why was Sonny Liston considered invincible after destroying Floyd Patterson? Nothing on Floyd's resume (other than a win over Archie Moore) points to the fact that he was a world beater.
As a champion ,I dare say ,he was protected from opponents considered dangerous. I he was a great offensive fighter but he was very easy to hit. If Ingemar could tee off on him at will, why in the world would anyone be suprised that he got demolished my Liston?
Not taking anything away from either fighter, but it doesn't look like a lopsided victory by Sonny Liston would be that shocking.Nor does it look like a victory over Floyd Patterson would signify the coming of an invincible champion.
Comment