How Do You Rank All Time Greats?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hawkins
    Anti-Hero
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 2145
    • 56
    • 62
    • 11,132

    #11
    I've seen the argument that its only fair to rate fighters from Louis to Lewis because there isn't enough footage of those before hand to accurate gauge them in conjunction with the modern guys.

    Comment

    • bklynboy
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 1256
      • 78
      • 149
      • 8,406

      #12
      The only question is how to rank and quantify these characteristics. For instance how does one quantify Agility,Power,Jab and Speed? How do we compare the jabs of Klitschko, Tyson, Holmes, Ali, Marciano, Louis ... ? I suppose one can have several classifications:

      1 - outstanding, HOF
      2 - better than average
      3 - average
      4- below average
      5- terrible

      I guess a program could be written that would allow us to rank fighters by using the criteria mentioned by Iron Man.

      Comment

      • The Iron Man
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2007
        • 1085
        • 136
        • 141
        • 8,540

        #13
        I done it on a Excel Spread Sheet Here :

        [IMG]http://i95.***********.com/albums/l151/Errol100/top10.jpg[/IMG]

        Comment

        • AntonTheMeh
          STOP CRYIN
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2007
          • 21222
          • 700
          • 709
          • 31,623

          #14
          Originally posted by Hawkins
          I've seen the argument that its only fair to rate fighters from Louis to Lewis because there isn't enough footage of those before hand to accurate gauge them in conjunction with the modern guys.
          pretty much,it sucks because there are so many innovators,harry greb joe gans,and even ray robinson in his prime that we will never get to see.

          Comment

          • bklynboy
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2007
            • 1256
            • 78
            • 149
            • 8,406

            #15
            Originally posted by ANTONIM
            to me it's got to be separate.
            everybody knows the guys today are more talented with the exception of a few

            i say separate with the modern era from the 40's to today
            and the old timers from the thirty's and back
            joe louis is the bridge
            I would agree with that in general but probably push it up to 1960 with Ali as the bridge. The fight game was a lot more brutal in the 50s than currently and the refs stop fights a lot sooner. Part of me likes the 1940's as the break because WWII was the break for so many things .

            Comment

            • AntonTheMeh
              STOP CRYIN
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 21222
              • 700
              • 709
              • 31,623

              #16
              in today's era of sports with the obsession with numbers i'm surprised they don't take into account compubox numbers,the win loss record of opponents and the record of the fighter cause everything else is hard to rate.

              Comment

              • AntonTheMeh
                STOP CRYIN
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 21222
                • 700
                • 709
                • 31,623

                #17
                Originally posted by bklynboy
                I would agree with that in general but probably push it up to 1960 with Ali as the bridge. The fight game was a lot more brutal in the 50s than currently and the refs stop fights a lot sooner. Part of me likes the 1940's as the break because WWII was the break for so many things .
                yeah but i believe that joe louis rocky marciano[maybe as cruiserweights]
                and ray robinson could compete today.

                Comment

                • bklynboy
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 1256
                  • 78
                  • 149
                  • 8,406

                  #18
                  I like that [referring to the Iron Man spreadsheet] -- I've thought of writing a ranking program a number of times. It would be interesting.
                  Last edited by bklynboy; 11-02-2007, 12:19 PM. Reason: make the post easier to understand

                  Comment

                  • The Iron Man
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 1085
                    • 136
                    • 141
                    • 8,540

                    #19
                    There are soo many different catagories i could add to that!

                    Comment

                    • bklynboy
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 1256
                      • 78
                      • 149
                      • 8,406

                      #20
                      Originally posted by ANTONIM
                      yeah but i believe that joe louis rocky marciano[maybe as cruiserweights]
                      and ray robinson could compete today.
                      I think the earlier greats could compete today as well. I think they would be killed if they were simply plunked down in the ring. If they would be given six months to watch videos and train I think the elite fighters of yesteryear could more than hold their own today.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP