Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

P4P hardest punchers of all time....

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by metalinmybrain View Post
    Foreman In 81 fights he has 68 knockouts. Tyson in 58 fights he has 44 knockouts. First round knockouts 23 for Tyson which is third next to Shavers and Dempsey whom both had more fights than Tyson. This alone proves how much power Tyson had and how much more he had than Foreman.

    Remember Alex Stewart who fought both Holyfield and Foreman said Tyson hit harder than both of them! What now "Hawkins"?
    Well we'll go to your original assessment. Tyson was a much better KO Artist than the young Foreman.

    Before George's comeback he had 46 fights with 43 ending in KO.

    What now metalhead?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Hawkins View Post
      Well we'll go to your original assessment. Tyson was a much better KO Artist than the young Foreman.

      Before George's comeback he had 46 fights with 43 ending in KO.

      What now metalhead?
      An excuse to the ending records pal. Fact is and let me say that againt FACT is Tyson is a better KO artist. Which means he is a more powerful puncher. Zouski Stewart Savarese all these men have said Tyson was the hardest puncher they have faced. All these men have faced Foreman and his power. Like it was said before the last thing you lose is your power. What is your excuse now Hawkid!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Hawkins View Post
        Well we'll go to your original assessment. Tyson was a much better KO Artist than the young Foreman.

        Before George's comeback he had 46 fights with 43 ending in KO.

        What now metalhead?
        Hawkid got

        Comment


        • Originally posted by metalinmybrain View Post
          An excuse to the ending records pal. Fact is and let me say that againt FACT is Tyson is a better KO artist. Which means he is a more powerful puncher. Zouski Stewart Savarese all these men have said Tyson was the hardest puncher they have faced. All these men have faced Foreman and his power. Like it was said before the last thing you lose is your power. What is your excuse now Hawkid!


          The fact is young Foreman had a higher KO percentage. Fact is most people think Tyson had faster handspeed as opposed to overall power as compared to Foreman.

          Your opinion is yours and yours alone. However, most people give the edge of overall power to Foreman. Tyson had three times the handspeed of Foreman and thats how he does the most damage and thats not debatable. The opinion that Tyson hit harder is a subjective opinion with which is mostly in the minority.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by metalinmybrain View Post
            Hawkid got
            LOL

            Whatever you say you expert you.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Hawkins View Post
              LOL

              Whatever you say you expert you.
              Put a brick wall in front of both Tyson and Foreman and Tyson would blow a hole through it first. That is power hawkid! No matter how you see it, when it comes to power Tyson has it all and in both hands something Foreman does not!

              Opinion right? So I guess your replies aren't opinions? Get it straight pal, your opinion is your opinion just as much as mine. When you have an 18 year old knocking heavyweights twice his size into the air what else would you call that but pure power. Foreman at that age wasn't even close to the power of Tyson, he didn't gain his power until later into his career. Had Tyson not been ****ed by all the troubles in his life we would have seen an even stronger more powerful Tyson. Tyson being so young with that much power alone proves how much of a natural powerhouse he was compared to Foreman.

              He was a kid knocking out grown men, something Foreman could only wish to do. He hit Mitch "blood" green with one punch in the streets and literally broke his entire left side of his face, ONE PUNCH!!! For his size, Tyson was beyond the hardest puncher of all time he was also the smallest. Foreman has leverage because of his size, put him into a Tyson body frame and Foreman is just another normal hitter.

              Like I said, put both men in front of a brick wall where it isn't moving to test their power and Tyson would knock a hole through it first.

              How can first round knockouts not mean anything to the credit of Tyson's raw power pal? How many first round knockouts does Foreman have, not enough to compare to Tyson's that is for damn sure. Foreman may have extreme power but he most certainly does not have the one punch power of Iron Mike Tyson.

              Peace out Hawkid, time for you to go to sleep it's passed your bed time! MetalinmybrainHawkid

              Comment


              • Originally posted by metalinmybrain View Post
                Put a brick wall in front of both Tyson and Foreman and Tyson would blow a hole through it first. That is power hawkid! No matter how you see it, when it comes to power Tyson has it all and in both hands something Foreman does not!

                Opinion right? So I guess your replies aren't opinions? Get it straight pal, your opinion is your opinion just as much as mine. When you have an 18 year old knocking heavyweights twice his size into the air what else would you call that but pure power. Foreman at that age wasn't even close to the power of Tyson, he didn't gain his power until later into his career. Had Tyson not been ****ed by all the troubles in his life we would have seen an even stronger more powerful Tyson. Tyson being so young with that much power alone proves how much of a natural powerhouse he was compared to Foreman.

                He was a kid knocking out grown men, something Foreman could only wish to do. He hit Mitch "blood" green with one punch in the streets and literally broke his entire left side of his face, ONE PUNCH!!! For his size, Tyson was beyond the hardest puncher of all time he was also the smallest. Foreman has leverage because of his size, put him into a Tyson body frame and Foreman is just another normal hitter.

                Like I said, put both men in front of a brick wall where it isn't moving to test their power and Tyson would knock a hole through it first.

                How can first round knockouts not mean anything to the credit of Tyson's raw power pal? How many first round knockouts does Foreman have, not enough to compare to Tyson's that is for damn sure. Foreman may have extreme power but he most certainly does not have the one punch power of Iron Mike Tyson.

                Peace out Hawkid, time for you to go to sleep it's passed your bed time! MetalinmybrainHawkid

                Punch thru a brick wall? Hmmm...ok.

                Regarding opinions I have stated many times on this messageboard I respect anyones opinion because thats exactly what it is, an opinion. However if they cannot express that opinion in a respectful way its a moot point. You just need to grow up and learn how to debate in a mature fashion.

                Anyways,I don't understand what your argument is. Did you ever see me, at anypoint deny Tyson had knockout power? Furthermore did I not state that Tyson had the quickest hands and combined with his power made him deadly?

                I do not see where the conflict is. Foreman hit alot harder and had the higher KO% before his comeback. Is that refutable? Did Foreman not have a higher KO %? If I remember correctly, until his return to the sport, he had the highest KO % in history at something like 91%.

                But whatever this is pointless because its clear you get off on trying to be 'inflammatory' on a messageboard. If that gets your rocks off then power to you 'pal'.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Hawkins View Post
                  Punch thru a brick wall? Hmmm...ok.

                  Regarding opinions I have stated many times on this messageboard I respect anyones opinion because thats exactly what it is, an opinion. However if they cannot express that opinion in a respectful way its a moot point. You just need to grow up and learn how to debate in a mature fashion.

                  Anyways,I don't understand what your argument is. Did you ever see me, at anypoint deny Tyson had knockout power? Furthermore did I not state that Tyson had the quickest hands and combined with his power made him deadly?

                  I do not see where the conflict is. Foreman hit alot harder and had the higher KO% before his comeback. Is that refutable? Did Foreman not have a higher KO %? If I remember correctly, until his return to the sport, he had the highest KO % in history at something like 91%.

                  But whatever this is pointless because its clear you get off on trying to be 'inflammatory' on a messageboard. If that gets your rocks off then power to you 'pal'.
                  Who would you rather get hit by hawkid?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by metalinmybrain View Post
                    Who would you rather get hit by hawkid?
                    What exactly does this have to with anything?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Sho-Nuff View Post
                      I remeber Shannon Briggs (saying of George Foreman) "He hit me so hard I thought I saw the messiah"
                      And that was a 48 year old Foreman.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP