Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More punching power: Tyson or Marciano?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Benny Leonard View Post
    If you go by what many say about the body of a "Man", Tyson would not have been in his physical "prime" nor "mental" (if you want to add that in to the equation) in what people determine was his "Prime." (which was only because we are basing it on him getting rid of Rooney and declining in his skill as a result); Tyson's physical prime should of been what many say is when they hit their "Man stage", 25+ years old.


    Also of note: According to an inteview (on another site) from one of Tyson's handlers (when he was with Rooney), Tyson was far more impressive in Training/Gym than he was in his fights. This was because Tyson was more relaxed in the Gym and could display what Rooney was teaching him and having him do. If I remember correctly, I think he stated Tyson was fighting with less than half or even 10% of what he was displaying in the gym.
    This is why people say fighting in the gym is different than fighting under the lights.

    I wonder however if Tyson had stayed with Rooney, matured into his 20's, giving him that time to become a "Master" of the D'amato style, building his mind of understanding the fight game inside the ring, how much better would have Tyson had been.

    But this is the problem and this is why some people feel disgusted towards Tyson, people feel he through it all away, that "we were cheated" of someone that could of and probably should have been the best.

    But who knows...


    Hope there is a "who hits harder, Marciano or Foreman "thread



    Pt 2

    i would agree with that if you have ever seen tyson sparring under rooney he looked a much more complete fighter than when he was in the ring defending his titles. He was quick , punched harder and more accurate , more headmovement and better footwork, balance and did moves that he never even dreamed of doing in the in the pro ring . You only have to look at his exhibition with sanders , the speed , the power he was a year older than when he lost to mcbride but he boxed and moved like he was 20 years younger. if the tyson who sparred with sanders fought any of the title holders today he would knock them out in one round but tyson isnt able to handle the spotlight and scrutiny anymore and doesent have the believe and that is why he coouldnt beat mcbride. he doesent have the believe or desire that he had with rooney . with rooney tyson was always scared of his opponent but he deflected that fear on to his opponent now when an opponent doesnt fall in one round and starts to tie him up him up the fear he has is deflected on himself and no longer is deflected on his opponent . he becomes afraid of loosing and gives up . Fear of failure is failure waiting to happen. They say boxing is 90% mental and 10 % physical and tyson opitimises that theory better than any fighter. It really is extraordinary to look at tyson against sanders and the tyson who lost to mcbride . They are like 2 completely different fighters . Its almost impossible for one to believe that they are the same guy but they are . It really is extraordinary.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by catskills23 View Post
      i would agree with that if you have ever seen tyson sparring under rooney he looked a much more complete fighter than when he was in the ring defending his titles. He was quick , punched harder and more accurate , more headmovement and better footwork, balance and did moves that he never even dreamed of doing in the in the pro ring . You only have to look at his exhibition with sanders , the speed , the power he was a year older than when he lost to mcbride but he boxed and moved like he was 20 years younger. if the tyson who sparred with sanders fought any of the title holders today he would knock them out in one round but tyson isnt able to handle the spotlight and scrutiny anymore and doesent have the believe and that is why he coouldnt beat mcbride. he doesent have the believe or desire that he had with rooney . with rooney tyson was always scared of his opponent but he deflected that fear on to his opponent now when an opponent doesnt fall in one round and starts to tie him up him up the fear he has is deflected on himself and no longer is deflected on his opponent . he becomes afraid of loosing and gives up . Fear of failure is failure waiting to happen. They say boxing is 90% mental and 10 % physical and tyson opitimises that theory better than any fighter. It really is extraordinary to look at tyson against sanders and the tyson who lost to mcbride . They are like 2 completely different fighters . Its almost impossible for one to believe that they are the same guy but they are . It really is extraordinary.
      tysons knee wasnt all the way heeled and your giving rooney way too much credit.. he abused his power after cus dmato died.. rooney sucks as a trainer thats why he has no fighters now that are any good

      Comment


      • I would say Tyson by far. Marciano, a devastating puncher in his own right, wore most of his opponents down with a cumulative effect of punches. Tyson, on the other hand, could (and did) knock mother****ers out with one punch - with either hand. Hell, I seen him knock this dude down with a jab! The true measure of his punching prowess is manifested in the number of fights he terminated within 3 rounds.

        It could also be argued that among heavyweights, Tyson was the single most devastating puncher of all times. A fellow by the name of George Foreman was also a brute, until Muhammad Ali rudely interrupted his journey toward becoming a legendary puncher. I'll never forget the jarring effect of a left hook that litterally lifted Joe Frazier off his feet before depositing him to the canvas in Jamaica.

        Top 10 Heavyweight Punchers:
        1. Mike Tyson
        2. George Foreman
        3. Sonny Liston
        4. Joe Louis
        5. Rocky Marciano
        6. Jack Dempsey
        7. Jack Johnson
        8. Joe Frazier
        9. Primo Carnera
        10. Muhammad Ali

        Comment


        • Tyson Easily

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Benny Leonard View Post
            If you go by what many say about the body of a "Man", Tyson would not have been in his physical "prime" nor "mental" (if you want to add that in to the equation) in what people determine was his "Prime." (which was only because we are basing it on him getting rid of Rooney and declining in his skill as a result); Tyson's physical prime should of been what many say is when they hit their "Man stage", 25+ years old.


            Also of note: According to an inteview (on another site) from one of Tyson's handlers (when he was with Rooney), Tyson was far more impressive in Training/Gym than he was in his fights. This was because Tyson was more relaxed in the Gym and could display what Rooney was teaching him and having him do. If I remember correctly, I think he stated Tyson was fighting with less than half or even 10% of what he was displaying in the gym.
            This is why people say fighting in the gym is different than fighting under the lights.

            I wonder however if Tyson had stayed with Rooney, matured into his 20's, giving him that time to become a "Master" of the D'amato style, building his mind of understanding the fight game inside the ring, how much better would have Tyson had been.

            But this is the problem and this is why some people feel disgusted towards Tyson, people feel he through it all away, that "we were cheated" of someone that could of and probably should have been the best.

            But who knows...


            Hope there is a "who hits harder, Marciano or Foreman "thread



            Pt 2

            best poster by far in this thread... karma your way...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Panamaniac View Post
              I would say Tyson by far. Marciano, a devastating puncher in his own right, wore most of his opponents down with a cumulative effect of punches. Tyson, on the other hand, could (and did) knock mother****ers out with one punch - with either hand. Hell, I seen him knock this dude down with a jab! The true measure of his punching prowess is manifested in the number of fights he terminated within 3 rounds.

              It could also be argued that among heavyweights, Tyson was the single most devastating puncher of all times. A fellow by the name of George Foreman was also a brute, until Muhammad Ali rudely interrupted his journey toward becoming a legendary puncher. I'll never forget the jarring effect of a left hook that litterally lifted Joe Frazier off his feet before depositing him to the canvas in Jamaica.

              Top 10 Heavyweight Punchers:
              1. Mike Tyson
              2. George Foreman
              3. Sonny Liston
              4. Joe Louis
              5. Rocky Marciano
              6. Jack Dempsey
              7. Jack Johnson
              8. Joe Frazier
              9. Primo Carnera
              10. Muhammad Ali
              what about earnie shavers

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Panamaniac View Post
                I would say Tyson by far. Marciano, a devastating puncher in his own right, wore most of his opponents down with a cumulative effect of punches. Tyson, on the other hand, could (and did) knock mother****ers out with one punch - with either hand. Hell, I seen him knock this dude down with a jab! The true measure of his punching prowess is manifested in the number of fights he terminated within 3 rounds.

                It could also be argued that among heavyweights, Tyson was the single most devastating puncher of all times. A fellow by the name of George Foreman was also a brute, until Muhammad Ali rudely interrupted his journey toward becoming a legendary puncher. I'll never forget the jarring effect of a left hook that litterally lifted Joe Frazier off his feet before depositing him to the canvas in Jamaica.

                Top 10 Heavyweight Punchers:
                1. Mike Tyson
                2. George Foreman
                3. Sonny Liston
                4. Joe Louis
                5. Rocky Marciano
                6. Jack Dempsey
                7. Jack Johnson
                8. Joe Frazier
                9. Primo Carnera
                10. Muhammad Ali

                Having Joe Frazier, Primo Carnera, MUHAMMAD ALI and Jack Johnson over Earnie Shavers as a puncher is obsurd. None of them hit harder than Shavers. Shavers has the hardest single punch in boxing history.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by realheavyhands View Post
                  what about earnie shavers
                  To be perfectly honest with you, I thought about him, but left him off the list because he never became a champion.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bill1234 View Post
                    Having Joe Frazier, Primo Carnera, MUHAMMAD ALI and Jack Johnson over Earnie Shavers as a puncher is obsurd. None of them hit harder than Shavers. Shavers has the hardest single punch in boxing history.
                    In boxing history?! That's quite a stretch. Do you know this to be an incontrovertible scientific fact?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bill1234 View Post
                      Having Joe Frazier, Primo Carnera, MUHAMMAD ALI and Jack Johnson over Earnie Shavers as a puncher is obsurd. None of them hit harder than Shavers. Shavers has the hardest single punch in boxing history.
                      Tyson KO4 Peak Larry Holmes

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP