he wasn't a great boxer or puncher but he had one of the biggest hearts of any boxer. to me this doesn't make him great but it is impressive
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was James J. Braddock a great boxer?
Collapse
-
-
Loughran was not merely a "good boxer", he was one of the most gifted natural boxers ever. I don't mean in terms of speed or anything, I'm talking about how he used his brain in there.
So no, not every good boxer is not going to easily beat him, but the very best would have to be favored.them_apples likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kid Achilles View PostLoughran was not merely a "good boxer", he was one of the most gifted natural boxers ever. I don't mean in terms of speed or anything, I'm talking about how he used his brain in there.
So no, not every good boxer is not going to easily beat him, but the very best would have to be favored.
Comment
-
Oh okay I apologize then. I took it to mean "Loughran beat him easily, so any half decent boxer would just the same".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kid Achilles View PostOh okay I apologize then. I took it to mean "Loughran beat him easily, so any half decent boxer would just the same".
Loughran doesnt get the recognition he deserves.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phantasm View PostI'm actually reading the book based on the film right now. I had read Jeremy Schaap's book when the film came out. The guy wasnt great, but had heart and a big right hand. If I were to compare him to a modern day fighter, it'd probably be Micky Ward (who happens to be my favorite fighter). And like Ward, he'd probably be a considered a good fighter, but not the elite. He made the boxing HOF based on his win over Baer, though he was a top Light Heavyweight prospect in his early days. But a good boxer would easily beat him, like Tommy Loughran did.
Comment
Comment