your best of all time is..

[brownpimp88]

I'm done arguing for or against...

I'd like to make the point though that lets say there was not films of fights from the 70's or prior, and they started filming around now...

Now lets say that this argument happened in 30 years from now...You'd say fighters like Ali, Foreman, Shavers, etc are all guys who must have been bad and overrated because they came from a time before we had film....Also the sport must have evolved and they therefore must not be as good as fighters of today like Kitschko, Peter, Toney, etc...

I'm just trying to make a point...do you get it?

Dude anyone that watches dempsey without knowing who he is, says he was talentless. The proof is right there, you can watch as many dempsey fights as you can get, he's horrible, no skills at all.

[K-DOGG]

Dude anyone that watches dempsey without knowing who he is, says he was talentless. The proof is right there, you can watch as many dempsey fights as you can get, he's horrible, no skills at all.

Do you have any idea how assinine such a statement is making you look? You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

[joelouisbarrow]

Dude anyone that watches dempsey without knowing who he is, says he was talentless. The proof is right there, you can watch as many dempsey fights as you can get, he's horrible, no skills at all.

and you were implying yesyerday that i was an idiot....seemingly my 15 year old daughter knows more about the fight game than you do

[brownpimp88]

O please, i'm not the only one that admits he sucks ass. His competiton was garbage, it makes lennox's opponents look like legends.

[K-DOGG]

O please, i'm not the only one that admits he sucks ass. His competiton was garbage, it makes lennox's opponents look like legends.

Right, a man with no talent, who was a "bum" won the world heavyweight championship by destroying all competition before he won the title and was regarded by his peers, to say nothing of most creditable boxing historians TODAY as one of the best whoever lived.

Right! And I'm Mary F'in Poppins.


You don't have to think he was "the best"; but to call a bonafied ATG "a bum"....you are not helping yourself one bit.

[Southpaw Stinger]

O please, i'm not the only one that admits he sucks ass. His competiton was garbage, it makes lennox's opponents look like legends.

or even Larry Holmes competition look good..

[brownpimp88]

or even Larry Holmes competition look good..

larry beat norton is better than dempsey winning the title off a cowboy that hides behind refs.

[brownpimp88]

Right, a man with no talent, who was a "bum" won the world heavyweight championship by destroying all competition before he won the title and was regarded by his peers, to say nothing of most creditable boxing historians TODAY as one of the best whoever lived. Right!


And I'm Mary F'in Poppins.


You don't have to think he was "the best"; but to call a bonafied ATG "a bum"....you are not helping yourself one bit.

why dont u enlighten us on his great resume that makes him one of the best ever. Firpo, sharkey and willard, o wow he beat true legends. Better yet he defended his belt against guys that are the same size as roy jones but with half the skill, what a golden era of boxing.

[Southpaw Stinger]

larry beat norton is better than dempsey winning the title off a cowboy that hides behind refs.

Dempsey beating Firpo is betting than beating an old drugged up former champ with parkinsons...

[brownpimp88]

Dempsey beating Firpo is betting than beating an old drugged up former champ with parkinsons...

shavers and cooney are held in a higer regard than firpo, hell david tua is better than firpo.