After Makhmudov, Kabayel should be his next step.
Beating Joshua proves nothing. Joshua is not even top 5 hw. Kabayel is. If Fury can beat Kabayel, than yes, I am fine with the third Usxk fight.
Kabayal already publicly came out and said he wouldn't fight Fury because he considered him a "friend" after helping him out for a fight.
The Zhang win was impressive, especially after getting off the deck. Kabayal throws excessively to the body and that will cause most heavyweights problems as the fight progresses through the rounds.
If he gets his shot at I feel like Usyk will weather an early storm before figuring his rhythm out and making him pay. Late KO or UD win for Usyk
You can fight friends. The klitschos can't fight each other of c ourse. But liking someone isn't really a valid reason, rather excuse.
Usyk v ajit though.
Agit Kabayel's best win is just about beating Derek Chisora in a fight which could have went ether way. .
Tyson Fury does not need to prove himself vs. Agit Kabayel 'a fighter who was a complete non-factor during the peak years of Fury, Joshua and Wilder's heavyweight reigns'.
Note: People need to stop overrating Kabayel, he has beaten no real elite level fighters 'and in terms of match making, I think it is an unnecessary fight for Tyson Fury'.
Although Tyson Fury has lost his last three fights, the fact remains that? He has not been completely dominated or knocked out 'in solid form, we still know that Tyson Fury is a top level fighter'.
Now what I will say is? Agit Kabayel would be a good opponent for Anthony Joshua 'because he has been beaten quite brutally by Daniel Dubois. In a fight which he did show courage and resolve, but the conclusion to that fight was him being knocked out'.
To conclude: So overall I just believe that the people in the boxing community, demanding that Tyson Fury needs to prove himself vs. Agit Kabayel are overrating Kabayel as a fighter 'and undermining Tyson Fury'.
Even if Anthony Joshua was to face and beat Agit Kabayel 'Joshua still has many better wins on his resume. But it would be a great win for him at this stage of his career, and it would almost alter the trajectory of his career by 180 degrees'.
Because Agit Kabayel is that guy who is 'hot right now, with certain folk within the boxing community etc.
Apollo7
BUT he IS a factor NOW. Is that why you want Fury to ducked him? 2026 is not 2016. Fighters should be fighting top fighters, not avoiding them so that they can weasel their way into big money fights and cherry pick their way back into contention. Do you think Joshua, Fury and Wilder should be given easy fights so that they can weasel their way back to the lucrative fights? They should have no extra privilege to cherry pick their way back to the big fights. Their name value is meaningless in regards to their status as GOOD fighters. They should have to fight for their place just as the other fighters have to. This favouritism for fighters is ridiculous and totally unjust.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5y22YErOUFM
Reading between the lines based on the initial facial expression of Kayabel didn't look too excited by the mentioned of Fury.
Fury is box office. And to be fair to him, he's earned that status. Just as Joshua did.
He doesn't need to fight for credibility. He needs to do just enough to convince casuals that he might still be viable.
He doesn't care about convincing us that he's viable. Real Boxing fans are low in numbers. Casuals are low in boxing knowledge but high in numbers.
Edit: don't know if this will even show up given how fooked this site is. But so long all - I can't be @rsed with this fooking shambles of a site.
Kabayal already publicly came out and said he wouldn't fight Fury because he considered him a "friend" after helping him out for a fight.
The Zhang win was impressive, especially after getting off the deck. Kabayal throws excessively to the body and that will cause most heavyweights problems as the fight progresses through the rounds.
If he gets his shot at I feel like Usyk will weather an early storm before figuring his rhythm out and making him pay. Late KO or UD win for Usyk
So you have many many excuses for Fury also.
Why not fight Kabayel?
Agit Kabayel's best win is just about beating Derek Chisora in a fight which could have went ether way. .
Tyson Fury does not need to prove himself vs. Agit Kabayel 'a fighter who was a complete non-factor during the peak years of Fury, Joshua and Wilder's heavyweight reigns'.
Note: People need to stop overrating Kabayel, he has beaten no real elite level fighters 'and in terms of match making, I think it is an unnecessary fight for Tyson Fury'.
Although Tyson Fury has lost his last three fights, the fact remains that? He has not been completely dominated or knocked out 'in solid form, we still know that Tyson Fury is a top level fighter'.
Now what I will say is? Agit Kabayel would be a good opponent for Anthony Joshua 'because he has been beaten quite brutally by Daniel Dubois. In a fight which he did show courage and resolve, but the conclusion to that fight was him being knocked out'.
To conclude: So overall I just believe that the people in the boxing community, demanding that Tyson Fury needs to prove himself vs. Agit Kabayel are overrating Kabayel as a fighter 'and undermining Tyson Fury'.
Even if Anthony Joshua was to face and beat Agit Kabayel 'Joshua still has many better wins on his resume. But it would be a great win for him at this stage of his career, and it would almost alter the trajectory of his career by 180 degrees'.
Because Agit Kabayel is that guy who is 'hot right now, with certain folk within the boxing community etc.
Apollo7
Tyson Fury has lost his last three fights, if Anthony Joshua was to beat Tyson Fury 'likewise, I don't really think it proves much. Stylistically Joshua has always been a challenging fight for Fury. Anthony Joshua in solid form has all the attributes to blast out Fury'.
Note: Oleksandr Uysk although he beat Tyson Fury twice back to back 'is still in my opinion stylistically a winnable fight for Fury. It was just the Uysk's endurance levels, and the ability to maintain the accuracy of his technical skills round after round which beat Fury'.
If Tyson Fury could improve his endurance levels, and fight a extremely technically sound boxing fight without committing any clumsy unforced errors 'he could push Oleksandr Uysk very close in a third fight'.
But improving in those areas for Tyson Fury will be very difficult, as from a physiological perspective 'it appears like Fury made a really big push to hammer himself into the best condition he had been in for many during the first Uysk fight'.
To conclude: At this stage in Tyson Fury's career, it is not about reproving that he is a top level fighter 'so all the people who believe he should fight Agit Kabayel are way off. Kabayel has been a professional fighter since 2011, for a longer period of time than Anthony Joshua'.
Agit Kabayel was a complete non-factor at top level during the peak years of Tyson Fury, Anthony Joshua, and Deontay Wilder's heavyweight reigns 'not because he was avoided, but due to him not being good enough'.
Only recently has Agit Kabayel decided to win some top level fights, and let's be honest? Those wins are being severely overrated. This heavyweight era is in its conclusive stages, so the levels of competition has understandably decreased'.
Tyson Fury does not need to reprove himself vs. Agit Kabayel 'in my opinion he just needs to get a few solid level wins. To justify a trilogy fight vs. Oleksandr Uysk' etc.
So you have many many excuses for Fury also.
Why not fight Kabayel?
Tyson Fury does not need to reprove himself vs. Agit Kabayel 'in my opinion he just needs to get a few solid level wins. To justify a trilogy fight vs. Oleksandr Uysk' etc.
Wouldn't Kabayel be a solid level win?
Tyson Fury has lost his last three fights, if Anthony Joshua was to beat Tyson Fury 'likewise, I don't really think it proves much. Stylistically Joshua has always been a challenging fight for Fury. Anthony Joshua in solid form has all the attributes to blast out Fury'.
Note: Oleksandr Uysk although he beat Tyson Fury twice back to back 'is still in my opinion stylistically a winnable fight for Fury. It was just the Uysk's endurance levels, and the ability to maintain the accuracy of his technical skills round after round which beat Fury'.
If Tyson Fury could improve his endurance levels, and fight a extremely technically sound boxing fight without committing any clumsy unforced errors 'he could push Oleksandr Uysk very close in a third fight'.
But improving in those areas for Tyson Fury will be very difficult, as from a physiological perspective 'it appears like Fury made a really big push to hammer himself into the best condition he had been in for many during the first Uysk fight'.
To conclude: At this stage in Tyson Fury's career, it is not about reproving that he is a top level fighter 'so all the people who believe he should fight Agit Kabayel are way off. Kabayel has been a professional fighter since 2011, for a longer period of time than Anthony Joshua'.
Agit Kabayel was a complete non-factor at top level during the peak years of Tyson Fury, Anthony Joshua, and Deontay Wilder's heavyweight reigns 'not because he was avoided, but due to him not being good enough'.
Only recently has Agit Kabayel decided to win some top level fights, and let's be honest? Those wins are being severely overrated. This heavyweight era is in its conclusive stages, so the levels of competition has understandably decreased'.
Tyson Fury does not need to reprove himself vs. Agit Kabayel 'in my opinion he just needs to get a few solid level wins. To justify a trilogy fight vs. Oleksandr Uysk' etc.
After Makhmudov, Kabayel should be his next step.
Beating Joshua proves nothing. Joshua is not even top 5 hw. Kabayel is. If Fury can beat Kabayel, than yes, I am fine with the third Usxk fight.
- - Blubber would sitting on U face ain't a good place for Joke the Boxer...:bottle: