Fun fact, Mikey Garcia has beaten the same amount of reigning world champions as GGG and Loma combined

Funniest thing is that Loma’s daddy, Arum, said he didn’t want to make the fight :lol1: False. But then again, you know that

That beyond pitiful MW "run" of his :lol1: !!!!!! No one wants to discuss that BS run Just throw a blanket over it and leave it alone TWO credible opps 1 official W in 4 tries vs them Can-crusher indeed​​

That beyond pitiful MW "run" of his :lol1: !!!!!! No one wants to discuss that BS run Just throw a blanket over it and leave it alone Can-crusher indeed

ive stated my position clearly u are too thick to understand i get it now im not going to go the next 12 days trying to explain it over and over again to the ultimate thicko on the planet so ill bid u good night & happy drooling i guess u go on to the next post and see how that goes, thanks Yes I'm very aware of your position, that's not been disputed. Your position is, I quote; "devin haney was promoted by bob arum for the loma fight, who he clearly favoured as he got the nod over loma" Are you reading the examples where the A side and favoured fighter didn't win close decisions thus making your position debunked? I genuinely don't know how I can explain this in an easier way to understand. It's gone from you not even knowing what the A side even is to a point where it doesn't look like you can even read.

froch dirrell i wonder who won that one? dirrell fans might argue otherwise, teo sandor martin, again lots of people think teo lost, hell people even think ortiz beat teo, its not hard to see a pattern, well it is actually if u have no brain How many times are you going to give an example of where the A side won a close decision before you realise it's not proving anything? Yes, of course, the A side tends to get the nod on close decisions but by the simple fact the B side has won close decisions a PLETHORA of times means that if fighter A wins the decision (in that case Haney) it does not prove they are "favoured by the promoter" nor does it make them the A side on that basis. Which part aren't you getting? I'll try and dumb it down.

Who said the A side don't tend to get more decisions in close fights than the B side? Oh yeah, no one. How did you get that from my post? YOU said Haney got the decision vs Loma, THEREFORE he's the A side and favoured by the promoter. That, is RETARDED, and easily debunked like I've done in the following posts after you made that assertion. You're aware that you've done that, right? Just asserted your position based off nothing? You know what an assertion is. Just because a fighter wins a close decision or even a bad decision doesn't equate them to being the A side or "favoured by the promoter". Do you need me to list the examples again that disprove your position or would you like a fresh one? ive stated my position clearly u are too thick to understand i get it now im not going to go the next 12 days trying to explain it over and over again to the ultimate thicko on the planet so ill bid u good night & happy drooling i guess u go on to the next post and see how that goes, thanks

listen u dummy if loma was the favoured fighter he would have won that fight, that should be clear to even an ass hat like yourself who is as thick as 2 planks of wood, no much thicker than that :pat: So WHY did Tim Bradley get the decision vs Pacquaio? WHY did any B sider ever win a close decision? How are you not seeing how non sensical and easily disproven your position is? It's wild. haney got the nod in that fight as the majority of a siders do and have done and will do well into the future, hell even floyd himself got the nod clearly in his close ones Ok, and? Your point being what? Floyd was the B side vs Oscar and won the decision, on a GOLDEN BOY SHOW. The fighter WAS the literal promoter. How is that possible?

froch dirrell i wonder who won that one? dirrell fans might argue otherwise, teo sandor martin, again lots of people think teo lost, hell people even think ortiz beat teo, its not hard to see a pattern, well it is actually if u have no brain

u are the thick one actually very thick if u cant understand that a siders get more decisions for them than b siders u should immediately check yourself into hospital because u actually have NO BRAIN WHATSOEVER in your head, if u even have a head that is​ Who said the A side don't tend to get more decisions in close fights than the B side? Oh yeah, no one. How did you get that from my post? YOU said Haney got the decision vs Loma, THEREFORE he's the A side and favoured by the promoter. That, is RETARDED, and easily debunked like I've done in the following posts after you made that assertion. You're aware that you've done that, right? Just asserted your position based off nothing? You know what an assertion is. Just because a fighter wins a close decision or even a bad decision doesn't equate them to being the A side or "favoured by the promoter". Do you need me to list the examples again that disprove your position or would you like a fresh one?

Ok so how do you know Haney beat Lomachenko because he was "favoured by the promoter?" And secondly, have you grasped that the A side fighter isn't always the home fighter? listen u dummy if loma was the favoured fighter he would have won that fight, that should be clear to even an ass hat like yourself who is as thick as 2 planks of wood, no much thicker than that haney got the nod in that fight as the majority of a siders do and have done and will do well into the future, hell even floyd himself got the nod clearly in his close ones

You called the other guy thick. Was that intentional irony or what is it? You can list 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00 fights whereby the A side won a decision that they should have lost. That happens. What is your point? Do I need to make another list of when the B side fighter wins a close decision for you to understand why your position makes no sense? u are the thick one actually very thick if u cant understand that a siders get more decisions for them than b siders u should immediately check yourself into hospital because u actually have NO BRAIN WHATSOEVER in your head, if u even have a head that is

its not always there same, there can be reasons for these decisions and i pointed them out in those cases its not going to happen in every case but it happened in those cases Ok so how do you know Haney beat Lomachenko because he was "favoured by the promoter?" And secondly, have you grasped that the A side fighter isn't always the home fighter?

kotelnik v devon alexander back in the day also, that was a bit embarrassing with devon taking shouting to bradley U next lol if i remember after a crap performance where he was handed the win as far i remember You called the other guy thick. Was that intentional irony or what is it? You can list 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 fights whereby the A side won a decision that they should have lost. That happens. What is your point? Do I need to make another list of when the B side fighter wins a close decision for you to understand why your position makes no sense?

No, I really don't think you do. You've just deemed JEFF HORN the A side vs MANNY PACQUAIO, who at the time was still one of the biggest PPV stars in the sport, because the fight was in Australia. You've then deemed Amir Khan as the B Side vs Lamont Peterson, because the fight was in Washington. Let me ask you, when Devin Haney fought George Kambosos, who was the A side in that fight? It's give you a hint, not the person from Australia. When AJ fought Andy Ruiz, who was the A side in that fight? I'll give you another hint, not the person from the USA. When Lomachenko fought Luke Campbell, who was the A side in that fight? I'll give you ANOTHER hint, not the person from the UK. I could go on. Shall I? Or have you grasped it? The A side is the fighter who get's the bigger split, the fighter who brings more money to the table. That's who the A Side is. The fact you've just tried to call Jeff Horn the A side in a fight vs MANNY PACQUAIO is legitimately one of the most comical things I've ever read. And on top of that, this is besides the point that your position is nonsensical and just stupid, really. You're asserting that Haney was the A side and "favoured by the promoter" on the basis that he was awarded the decision. Does that actually make sense in your head? Because if it does you should be worried. I've just given you a list of B side fighters who won decisions. It quite literally debunks your theory. And there's a whole long list of other examples of that. its not always there same, there can be reasons for these decisions and i pointed them out in those cases its not going to happen in every case but it happened in those cases

u mention charlo but i also remember a very su****ious fight v korobov i think it was a clear as day robbery actually And that has what to do with he fact he lost a close decision to the B side fighter? Shouldn't Charlo have won that on the basis he was the A side? Like you're claiming was the case with Haney? Can you genuinely not see the gaping hole in your assertion?

kotelnik v devon alexander back in the day also, that was a bit embarrassing with devon taking shouting to bradley U next lol if i remember after a crap performance where he was handed the win as far i remember

i dont think u do No, I really don't think you do. You've just deemed JEFF HORN the A side vs MANNY PACQUAIO, who at the time was still one of the biggest PPV stars in the sport, because the fight was in Australia. You've then deemed Amir Khan as the B Side vs Lamont Peterson, because the fight was in Washington. Let me ask you, when Devin Haney fought George Kambosos, who was the A side in that fight? It's give you a hint, not the person from Australia. When AJ fought Andy Ruiz, who was the A side in that fight? I'll give you another hint, not the person from the USA. When Lomachenko fought Luke Campbell, who was the A side in that fight? I'll give you ANOTHER hint, not the person from the UK. I could go on. Shall I? Or have you grasped it? The A side is the fighter who get's the bigger split, the fighter who brings more money to the table. That's who the A Side is. The fact you've just tried to call Jeff Horn the A side in a fight vs MANNY PACQUAIO is legitimately one of the most comical things I've ever read. And on top of that, this is besides the point that your position is nonsensical and just stupid, really. You're asserting that Haney was the A side and "favoured by the promoter" on the basis that he was awarded the decision. Does that actually make sense in your head? Because if it does you should be worried. I've just given you a list of B side fighters who won decisions. It quite literally debunks your theory. And there's a whole long list of other examples of that.

not to mention all the help a siders get in the ring as well, like the rolly fight and andre ward with tony weeks wow is all i can say

My man, do you understand the concept of what the A side is? I'm really not sure that you do. u mention charlo but i also remember a very suspicious fight v korobov i think it was a clear as day robbery actually

My man, do you understand the concept of what the A side is? I'm really not sure that you do. i dont think u do