TBud’s rear end and frontal genitalia must be extremely sensitive with all you grown men slurping him from both sides. But I think you need to calm down and give him a rest — he’s probably numb by now.
You guys are hyping his win against Viktor Postol as if it’s greater than knocking out a prime George Foreman, which is laughable in itself. But let’s get to the real wins you’ve been slobbering over him for.
Errol Spence, whose prime was left on the dashboards of two cars he totaled, was a shell of himself. Was he ever really that great to begin with?
I guess since Errol wasn’t nearly rolled over by Gamboa — a 5’4” fighter moving up two weight divisions — some people on here thought it would be a real 50/50 fight. But I looked back, and it was easy money for me. Still, that win is nowhere near as big as you all make it out to be.
Then we move on to the Canelo fight.
Canelo vs. Bud was a very competitive matchup between two guys of the same weight — except one was simply a weight bully. Crawford had been walking around for years at the same weight Canelo fights at. I scored it 8–4 for Bud. I gave two rounds as dominant to him, and the rest were close.
But let’s put that in context:
* Mayweather dominated Canelo with a 12-round shutout.
* Bivol dominated Canelo 10–2.
* Lara beat Canelo 7–5 if you have working eyes.
* GGG clearly won the first fight.
* The second fight I could maybe call a draw if I’m being generous, but I still believe GGG won.
Canelo was even made to look clueless at times against William Scull, since he couldn’t cut off the ring. And before that, he went life and death with John Ryder.
So no, Bud is not the GOAT, and he’s nowhere near Mayweather or Pacquiao’s status to any real hardcore boxing fan without racial bias.
I must ask my self, why doesn`t Bud have about 10+ wins at 160-168, he is obviuosly big enough.
Is it because he prefers fighting smaller guys?
Bring back the same day weight inn and reduce number of divisions, we don`t need half of them.yes but we dont know as far as i know anyway what bud for example weighted fight night from 147, he may have been about 160 which would be around normal for guys at that weight or he may have been a +25 pound guy and put on more, him going up in weight and beating canelo may be more a reflection of his ability but as for weights we just dont know these things like we used to, which is a real shamebecause Jake is being silly
there is a big difference between starting at 168 VS growing into 168 from 135 or 154. Saul being the latter
Saul is closer in natural size to TBud than Osleys Diego Hamzah
Remember when Saul’s flush punches bounced off of Bivol who started at 175
yet Saul hurt TBud 3 times due to them being nearer each other in size
Haney is with Snac and he puts on 25lbs or for fight night
Crawford is also with Snac
knowing this information its quite easy to see whats actually going on here it doesnt take Sherlock Holmes and Watson to firgure it out .
2 & 2 doesnt always make 5 or should i say 4
yes but we dont know as far as i know anyway what bud for example weighted fight night from 147, he may have been about 160 which would be around normal for guys at that weight or he may have been a +25 pound guy and put on more, him going up in weight and beating canelo may be more a reflection of his ability but as for weights we just dont know these things like we used to, which is a real shame
Haney is with Snac and he puts on 25lbs or for fight night
Crawford is also with Snac
knowing this information its quite easy to see whats actually going on here it doesnt take Sherlock Holmes and Watson to firgure it out .
I must ask my self, why doesn`t Bud have about 10+ wins at 160-168, he is obviuosly big enough.
Is it because he prefers fighting smaller guys?
Bring back the same day weight inn and reduce number of divisions, we don`t need half of them.
yes but we dont know as far as i know anyway what bud for example weighted fight night from 147, he may have been about 160 which would be around normal for guys at that weight or he may have been a +25 pound guy and put on more, him going up in weight and beating canelo may be more a reflection of his ability but as for weights we just dont know these things like we used to, which is a real shame
Nelo said bud is better than floyd. With a win over Nelo at 168, that's certainly a bigger risk than floyd ever took.
So better than floyd by the time bud retires. Unlikely to be greater than pac though as pac campaigned in his 7th weight class for 10 years. When pac best cotto, bud is probably at that stage of pac s accomplishments. Bud needs to campaign at 168 for 5 years beating all comers to be where pac is
Agreed! Also, when Floyd defeated Canelo. He had a catchweight and both a rematch and rehydration clause. Bud didn’t have any of that.
With that being said; I still believe Crawford was a better fighter than both Mayweather and Pacquiao. Even though history won’t record it.
Pac had his chance against Crawford as early as 2017 but decided to duck him in order to fight Jeff Horn. A man who Crawford KO instead but lost.
Canelo’s loss to Terence Crawford must have really hurt the Canelo’s fanboys; Which Includes this topic starter, Abel Sanchez and Eddie Hearn.
He hurt them so bad that now they want to see him retire. Since he exposed their hero as an overrated cherrypicking fraud.
I must ask my self, why doesn`t Bud have about 10+ wins at 160-168, he is obviuosly big enough.
Is it because he prefers fighting smaller guys?
Bring back the same day weight inn and reduce number of divisions, we don`t need half of them.
Nelo said bud is better than floyd. With a win over Nelo at 168, that's certainly a bigger risk than floyd ever took.
So better than floyd by the time bud retires. Unlikely to be greater than pac though as pac campaigned in his 7th weight class for 10 years. When pac best cotto, bud is probably at that stage of pac s accomplishments. Bud needs to campaign at 168 for 5 years beating all comers to be where pac is
Go do something useful with your life, like getting a girlfriend. But a mentally-ill troll like you could never attract a woman, so you make do with what you got, working the bellends
at your local gloryhole. :bottle:let me get this straight
bipolar loser LIFE GOAL is to get himself girlfriend
how pathetic
I definitely do not want to be you:rofl:
poor stuntman's meltdown thread
there's maybe 3 guys here who consider TBud goat
so dramatic TBud is an emotional subject for stuntman
Go do something useful with your life, like getting a girlfriend. But a mentally-ill troll like you could never attract a woman, so you make do with what you got, working the bellends
at your local gloryhole. :bottle:
His win against postol was pretty good. I remember thinking it would be a tough fight but Crawford won pretty easy.
Postol is a good fighter who lost to Taylor and got robbed against Ramirez.
Spencerina was never that good. Thurman beat his best wins (porter, garcia) years earlier and in better fashion. His claim to fame was going to decision against an overrated fat mickey garcia who retired to duck LOMA
Now the carnela win was really good. He moved up and beat a guy who was campaigned at 168 for years. A guy everyone calls an atg but really was just very good and gifted wins.
To sum it up me personally, I underrated my boy Crawford and overrated carnela and then I was surprised when Crawford not only won but whooped carnela. Hopefully they both retire.
*Fixed it for you
canelo fans worse i would say
canelo is still a hard guy to beat yes u do have to be of a very good standard to do it, bud gets extra brownie points for coming up in weight and doing it as well i would say
Saying that looking at canelo and his opponents over the last many years i would say it was quite likely he was going to lose to the first very good guy he faced, he should have lost his titles to benny for example but was allowed to shamefully duck him for years by the wbc so it was perfect timing from bud to do what he did & he was good enough to get the job done, clearing out 154 tho would have told us more about things than the 1 fight v risk averse canelo now i would think, 154 is now full of young prime guys with different styles, coming out on top of that now would be impressive i think
legendary resume misleading record
Would Saul still be all time great if change Saul record to have 2 more losses and a draw from these guys Austin Erislandy golovkin
Saul was handpicked for stardom and had the best scorecard protection services I ever seen
everyone who beat Saul wide would end up with a draw card or multiple 115-113
the powers that be wanted a return on their investment Saul
This week has been worse than any group of fans I’ve ever seen on this site, and that includes the Mayweather–Pacquiao fanatics. .
canelo fans worse i would say
canelo is still a hard guy to beat yes u do have to be of a very good standard to do it, bud gets extra brownie points for coming up in weight and doing it as well i would say
Saying that looking at canelo and his opponents over the last many years i would say it was quite likely he was going to lose to the first very good guy he faced, he should have lost his titles to benny for example but was allowed to shamefully duck him for years by the wbc so it was perfect timing from bud to do what he did & he was good enough to get the job done, clearing out 154 tho would have told us more about things than the 1 fight v risk averse canelo now i would think, 154 is now full of young prime guys with different styles, coming out on top of that now would be impressive i think
List of 4 division lineal champions in the history of men's professional boxing:
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
2. Manny Pacquiao
3. Terence Crawford
List of 3 division undisputed champions in the WBA/WBC era:
1. Terence Crawford
List of 5 division world titlists in the history of men's boxing:
1. Tommy Hearns (only if you count WBO titles from before the WBO was widely recognized)
2. Sugar Ray Leonard (won his super middle and light heavy titles in the same fight at a catchweight)
3. Oscar De La Hoya
4. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Terence Crawford
End of discussion.
You seem down to earth
Would you rank crawford higher than mayweather ans pacquiao atg?
Mayweather yes mainly because he's a drug cheat and Pacquiao, no. Pacquiao, like froid has an illustrious career. Not to say Crawford didn't but Pacquiao was around when boxing was at its height where him and froid were consistently selling 1mil ppvs. Crawford didn't have the hype coming up as either of those guys but he didn't have the opponents that would give him the hype either. He did good numbers on hbo against decent opposition. But I'd say Pacquiao has the better resume and it's not even close.
Also to be fair the catchweights do leave an ugly look on pacs resume.
Would you rank crawford higher than mayweather ans pacquiao atg?upon post fight victory high wearing off after TBud having had the next best win in the history of the sport of boxing somewhere between top 21 to top 30 is good
Sugar Robinson
Harry
Henry
Sam
Ezzard
Willie
Muhammad
Roberto
Joe
Sugar Leonard
Floyd
Benny
Pernell
manny
Jimmy
Archie
Carlos
Marvin
Barney
Tony
Julio Cesar
Larry
Rocky
Gene
Jack
You’re one of the main slurpers, and maybe you don’t consider him great, but I honestly think of you as a low-IQ idiot with racial bias.
You’re in every single Crawford thread baiting people. I think you should get some sun on your proud skin tomorrow.
again this fighter has a completely different complexion from mines:slap:
You live in your own little world where all of his fans are black people rofl:Thinkingo
poor stuntman is upset because I said TBud beats manny h2h:rofl:
at least the 3 TBuddy trolls da pimper satiev rjjgoat do not get emotional and take it personally like you. slurpy tendency on your end stuntman:bottle:
:haha:
:grouphug:
His win against postol was pretty good. I remember thinking it would be a tough fight but Crawford won pretty easy.
Postol is a good fighter who lost to Taylor and got robbed against Ramirez.
Spencerina was never that good. Thurman beat his best wins (porter, garcia) years earlier and in better fashion. His claim to fame was going to decision against an overrated fat mickey garcia who retired to duck Gamboa (another top fighter Crawford beat).
Now the carnela win was really good. He moved up and beat a guy who was campaigned at 168 for years. A guy everyone calls an atg but really was just very good and gifted wins.
To sum it up me personally, I underrated my boy Crawford and overrated carnela and then I was surprised when Crawford not only won but whooped carnela. Hopefully they both retire.
You seem down to earth
Would you rank crawford higher than mayweather ans pacquiao atg?
poor stuntman's meltdown thread
there's maybe 3 guys here who consider TBud goat
so dramatic TBud is an emotional subject for stuntman
You’re one of the main slurpers, and maybe you don’t consider him great, but I honestly think of you as a low-IQ idiot with racial bias.
You’re in every single Crawford thread baiting people. I think you should get some sun on your proud skin tomorrow.
His win against postol was pretty good. I remember thinking it would be a tough fight but Crawford won pretty easy.
Postol is a good fighter who lost to Taylor and got robbed against Ramirez.
Spencerina was never that good. Thurman beat his best wins (porter, garcia) years earlier and in better fashion. His claim to fame was going to decision against an overrated fat mickey garcia who retired to duck Gamboa (another top fighter Crawford beat).
Now the carnela win was really good. He moved up and beat a guy who was campaigned at 168 for years. A guy everyone calls an atg but really was just very good and gifted wins.
To sum it up me personally, I underrated my boy Crawford and overrated carnela and then I was surprised when Crawford not only won but whooped carnela. Hopefully they both retire.