Mine is
1. Crawford
2. Usyk
3. Bivol
4. Inoue
5. Beterbiev
Feel like Bivol should even be number 2 because of all the blatant ducking of Usyk on Parker it's getting kinda embarassing at this point.
Inoue was on a bum streak the past year fighting guys like Doheny, Ye Joon and uber driver Cardenas. while Bivol went to war twice with Beterbiev on that span.
I'd like to see Crawford vs Bivol at 168lbs staking Bivol's belts at 175 and Crawford's undisputed belts.
Anyone who have Crawford outside of 1 is one of the most deluded bias boxing fans on planet earth. Not wroth even blinking at their opinion. Absolute comedy at this point.....
Crawford HAS to be #1 for the simple fact that he’s now undisputed in 3 weight classes vs. 2 for Inoue & Usyk. Inoue could match this feat in the future (although unlikely) whereas it’s impossible for Usyk to do the same (unless he decides to destroy the Bridgerweight’s :rofl:).
However, I still think that both Usyk and Inoue have a claim because they’ve beaten more ELITE fighters although personally I put Crawford #1 for his history-making achievement.
Spence and Nelo
That's about it
Crawford HAS to be #1 for the simple fact that he’s now undisputed in 3 weight classes vs. 2 for Inoue & Usyk. Inoue could match this feat in the future (although unlikely) whereas it’s impossible for Usyk to do the same (unless he decides to destroy the Bridgerweight’s :rofl:).
However, I still think that both Usyk and Inoue have a claim because they’ve beaten more ELITE fighters although personally I put Crawford #1 for his history-making achievement.
Crawford just showed why P4P is nonsense when you have so many divisions.
He's the same size as Canelo. These guys should be fighting at their optimal weight against other guys fighting at their optimal weight.
Guys making their career winning titles by shrinking and growing themselves into whatever pool of fighters is best suited to them is a joke.
Even 8 divisions might be too many. 17+ is ridiculous.