Mayweather named best boxer of the Century !

Crawford moves up on this list.

Whether dlh was Only a foaming at the mouth Pac Boi would question "whether" or not DONE La Hoya was past it or not vs Pac.......

Careful, Pac beating "the brakes" off of DLH is one of Pac's biggest W's :lol1: Whether dlh was past prime, dlh still has the sense to realise pac is his toughest opponent ever. And from a man who fought pernell, chavez, hopkins. That says a lot. So yes, it is an.important win

Whether dlh was past prime, dlh still has the sense to realise pac is his toughest opponent ever. And from a man who fought pernell, chavez, hopkins. That says a lot. So yes, it is an.important win

In the 00s Shane has better resume. In the 10s Maidana clearly won who had a string of losses already.

Also I wouldnt consider that a prime Oscar that fought Floyd and definitely not when Oscar lost to Manny. Careful, Pac beating "the brakes" off of DLH is one of Pac's biggest W's :lol1:

I do not believe manny is that small He could have returned at 46 to 140 but instead chose 147 the guys who tried this Zab and manny had less success than the all up in your ass pressure guys Jose Miguel Marcos Oscar isn't exactly a pressure guy either but the all up in your ass pressure allowed Oscar to peel 4 rounds off of Floyd: the 2nd the 4th the 6th Floyd had to start timeing Zab in his fight. He definitely had to make adjustments. Oscar mixes it up. Which makes him difficult to fight when hes focus. Also I wouldnt consider that a prime Oscar that fought Floyd and definitely not when Oscar lost to Manny.

150lbs isnt his natural weight thats the point. He can gain all the weight he wants. That doesnt equal natural strength for your original body frame. Manny's ideal weight is probably 140lb and Below. However I am one of the people who view Mannys success at 147lbs as not naturally 'clean'..I do not believe manny is that small He could have returned at 46 to 140 but instead chose 147 Top 3? You got him over Chavez, Frazier, Sonny Listen, Rocky, Ragging Bull and etc ? Floyd would dance around Duran like Leonard did in the rematch. You are giving Duran too much credit. He is not a complex fighter. You gotta set traps for Floyd. Like Molsey and Judah did who are both slick boxer punchers. Duran would make floyd fight on the back foot. Thats what floyd wants. You gotta trick floyd to feel more comfortable with leading off then rock him. the guys who tried this Zab and manny had less success than the all up in your ass pressure guys Jose Miguel Marcos Oscar isn't exactly a pressure guy either but the all up in your ass pressure allowed Oscar to peel 4 rounds off of Floyd: the 2nd the 4th the 6th

but 147 and 154 Floyd was a pure boxer-counterstriker Roberto a top 3 all time infighter close quarters the range that works best against Floyd common opponents picked Floyd to beat manny. and that's what happened you want tangible things that were achieved in their careers rofl manny was 150 on the night of to Floyd's 148 going off of weight how boxing measures size manny was bigger. Floyd mopped manny anyways 10-2'ing that ass. manny could only win 2 clear rounds the fourth and sixth manny simply lacks the skillset to overcome the difference in levels and stylistic edge for Floyd Top 3? You got him over Chavez, Frazier, Sonny Listen, Rocky, Ragging Bull and etc ? Floyd would dance around Duran like Leonard did in the rematch. You are giving Duran too much credit. He is not a complex fighter. You gotta set traps for Floyd. Like Molsey and Judah did who are both slick boxer punchers. Duran would make floyd fight on the back foot. Thats what floyd wants. You gotta trick floyd to feel more comfortable with leading off then rock him.

but 147 and 154 Floyd was a pure boxer-counterstriker Roberto a top 3 all time infighter close quarters the range that works best against Floyd common opponents picked Floyd to beat manny. and that's what happened you want tangible things that were achieved in their careers rofl manny was 150 on the night of to Floyd's 148 going off of weight how boxing measures size manny was bigger. Floyd mopped manny anyways 10-2'ing that ass. manny could only win 2 clear rounds the fourth and sixth manny simply lacks the skillset to overcome the difference in levels and stylistic edge for Floyd 150lbs isnt his natural weight thats the point. He can gain all the weight he wants. That doesnt equal natural strength for your original body frame. Manny's ideal weight is probably 140lb and Below. However I am one of the people who view Mannys success at 147lbs as not naturally 'clean'..

You literally making no sense. You saying floyd always beats pac as he's bigger. That's just an opinion as floyd only had 1 controversial win over pac. DLH and Cott o said pac in his prime beats floyd, again just an opinion but they shared ring with both. Actually DLH has flip flopped on who'd win, he has said floyd and I've heard him say pac too. But it's about if Pac was in prime, rather than if pac was naturally bigger that pac beats floyd. Calzaghe beats pac overall too I guess as he's bigger? Pac is better pf p fighter. That's all that matters and all we are discussing. You seem to want to think floyd beats pac if naturally same size too? Again that's just your opinion. We want tangible things of what's been accomplished in careers I never said that. I think (manny could win) if him and floyd was the same size thats why I put manny higher on the pound 4 pound. I clearly said this. Idc what cotto and DLH say. Oscar is a c0ke head and cotto was a average fighter.

Roberto Duran only beat Leonard when Leonard fought his fight. When Leonard went to the slick boxer puncher. He made Duran quit. When a tall lanky boxer puncher like Hearns met Duran he folded him. Duran was able to hang with hagler due to the style of how hagler fought. but 147 and 154 Floyd was a pure boxer-counterstriker Roberto a top 3 all time infighter close quarters the range that works best against Floyd But common opponents said Pac was better. It depends on what you mean better. If you mean harder to hit, than floyd is better. But common opponents dont say they thought Pac was tougher as hes especially hard to hit. Its everything else that Pac bought to table. How can you say Pac will never beat Floyd, when common opponents said Pac would. And Floyd would have to prove he can beat Pac twice? Bradley beat Pac once, as did Morales. But look what happened in a triology? Also Pac is considerably smaller so that you dont thinkPac can beat Floyd, dont actually mean Floyd is better, or rather greater fighter. Just means hes bigger with height and reach and naturaly weight advantages and youd favour Floyd. But floyd never even proved he was better than Pac h2h. We like triologies or rematches to determine that historically.common opponents picked Floyd to beat manny. and that's what happened you want tangible things that were achieved in their careers rofl Is it just me or people on here dont read? I clearly stated that. Floyd would win because hes a naturally bigger guy with superior defensive skills. There's no opportunity for him to beat Floyd. Now if they both were the same size then thats a different story. Once again that would be a Pound 4 pound discussion not a better boxer/ fighter overall. I clearly said manny was better pound 4 pound over floyd but overall hes not better or could beat him at lightweight or welterweight. Common fighters dont matter because styles make fights. Just because they have common opponents doesnt mean floyd or manny fought each one the same way especially floyd but the common disadvantage in your argument is. Floyd already beat Manny at 147lbs. Floyd has defeated everyone he fought. You have no leg for your argument unless you really believe manny lied going into a fight with known injury or you are debating pound 4 pound. This isnt a pound for pound article its the best overall in the century. Floyd beat manny in this century. manny was 150 on the night of to Floyd's 148 going off of weight how boxing measures size manny was bigger. Floyd mopped manny anyways 10-2'ing that ass. manny could only win 2 clear rounds the fourth and sixth manny simply lacks the skillset to overcome the difference in levels and stylistic edge for Floyd

Is it just me or people on here dont read? I clearly stated that. Floyd would win because hes a naturally bigger guy with superior defensive skills. There's no opportunity for him to beat Floyd. Now if they both were the same size then thats a different story. Once again that would be a Pound 4 pound discussion not a better boxer/ fighter overall. I clearly said manny was better pound 4 pound over floyd but overall hes not better or could beat him at lightweight or welterweight. Common fighters dont matter because styles make fights. Just because they have common opponents doesnt mean floyd or manny fought each one the same way especially floyd but the common disadvantage in your argument is. Floyd already beat Manny at 147lbs. Floyd has defeated everyone he fought. You have no leg for your argument unless you really believe manny lied going into a fight with known injury or you are debating pound 4 pound. This isnt a pound for pound article its the best overall in the century. Floyd beat manny in this century. You literally making no sense. You saying floyd always beats pac as he's bigger. That's just an opinion as floyd only had 1 controversial win over pac. DLH and Cott o said pac in his prime beats floyd, again just an opinion but they shared ring with both. Actually DLH has flip flopped on who'd win, he has said floyd and I've heard him say pac too. But it's about if Pac was in prime, rather than if pac was naturally bigger that pac beats floyd. Calzaghe beats pac overall too I guess as he's bigger? Pac is better pf p fighter. That's all that matters and all we are discussing. You seem to want to think floyd beats pac if naturally same size too? Again that's just your opinion. We want tangible things of what's been accomplished in careers

But common opponents said Pac was better. It depends on what you mean better. If you mean harder to hit, than floyd is better. But common opponents dont say they thought Pac was tougher as hes especially hard to hit. Its everything else that Pac bought to table. How can you say Pac will never beat Floyd, when common opponents said Pac would. And Floyd would have to prove he can beat Pac twice? Bradley beat Pac once, as did Morales. But look what happened in a triology? Also Pac is considerably smaller so that you dont thinkPac can beat Floyd, dont actually mean Floyd is better, or rather greater fighter. Just means hes bigger with height and reach and naturaly weight advantages and youd favour Floyd. But floyd never even proved he was better than Pac h2h. We like triologies or rematches to determine that historically. Is it just me or people on here dont read? I clearly stated that. Floyd would win because hes a naturally bigger guy with superior defensive skills. There's no opportunity for him to beat Floyd. Now if they both were the same size then thats a different story. Once again that would be a Pound 4 pound discussion not a better boxer/ fighter overall. I clearly said manny was better pound 4 pound over floyd but overall hes not better or could beat him at lightweight or welterweight. Common fighters dont matter because styles make fights. Just because they have common opponents doesnt mean floyd or manny fought each one the same way especially floyd but the common disadvantage in your argument is. Floyd already beat Manny at 147lbs. Floyd has defeated everyone he fought. You have no leg for your argument unless you really believe manny lied going into a fight with known injury or you are debating pound 4 pound. This isnt a pound for pound article its the best overall in the century. Floyd beat manny in this century.

Lol.....

A win against Mike Tyson would lock King Floyd at #1.

No matter how you split it. Manny isnt better than floyd and never will beat Floyd at light weight or welterweight. Floyd's reach, ring generalship, IQ, counter punching and etc is Manny Pacquiaos kryptonite. While floyds kryptonite might be a slick boxer puncher. Maybe like Sugar Ray Leonard. But common opponents said Pac was better. It depends on what you mean better. If you mean harder to hit, than floyd is better. But common opponents dont say they thought Pac was tougher as hes especially hard to hit. Its everything else that Pac bought to table. How can you say Pac will never beat Floyd, when common opponents said Pac would. And Floyd would have to prove he can beat Pac twice? Bradley beat Pac once, as did Morales. But look what happened in a triology? Also Pac is considerably smaller so that you dont thinkPac can beat Floyd, dont actually mean Floyd is better, or rather greater fighter. Just means hes bigger with height and reach and naturaly weight advantages and youd favour Floyd. But floyd never even proved he was better than Pac h2h. We like triologies or rematches to determine that historically.

styles with an edge over Floyd: Henry and Roberto. two top 10 all time guys infighting swarmer Pernell would win rounds too Without the size advantage I do not see Sugar Leonard having edge Floyd made adjustments quicker than Sugar Leonard did Sugar Robinson Harry Henry Sam Ezzard Willie Muhammad Roberto Joe Sugar Leonard Floyd Benny Pernell manny Roberto Duran only beat Leonard when Leonard fought his fight. When Leonard went to the slick boxer puncher. He made Duran quit. When a tall lanky boxer puncher like Hearns met Duran he folded him. Duran was able to hang with hagler due to the style of how hagler fought.

- - Manny and l'l floydy only a year apart on their births. TBE TUE needed a 2 week backdated Vegas Commish TUE and Vegas altered scorecards to secure the win resulting in something like a $100 Mils in lawsuits. l'l floydy ran and cowered on the ropes with his back turned, a clear DQ when all Manny was trying to do was serve him the sushi l'l floydy ordered... - - Just a reminder...

tu hermana! that paternal did a number on you El_Maricon and her:rofl: come come El_Maricon:grouphug: Says the halfaf.ag fanboy.