How come nobody is talking about Tank vs Martin?

Babbling. Go away and try to make a friend. Id rather pin the tail on a hater its interesting watching them run on empty, fkn terrible disease that hating, do you think its a genetic trait?

Tank fought Barrios, he fought Garcia, let's remember he's a natural 130-pounder, we should be looking at Navarrette and Loma as his natural rivals, along with Frank Martin. The weight thing is all screwed up and the fights in these 130-140 lbs. divisions are personal grudge matches, weight and belts are useless. Haney gets to be undisputed without fighting Loma, Lopez, Tank or Garcia - he saw a one-hit wonder in Kambosos, an unavailable Loma and he pushed Kambosos out of the way like a gnat, in two awful fights that reminded me how overrated Haney is. So Tank is in the middle of all this and he can't win for trying. Frank Martin is a combination-throwing, high IQ southpaw with the right attitude. He's only trash-talking to shut Tank up. I'd give him more of a chance if he had a bit more power, because unless you take Tank down, he's going to find a way to win. Romero, Garcia, Pit Bull Cruz, Leo Santa Cuz, Barrios -- he won differently each time. Hard to bet against him but Martin will put up a good showing I believe. Both had rehydration clauses and garcia had a catchweight as well. Let's not act like those were legit fights now. Draining your opponents is not cool. Is he going to make them wear pillow gloves next? He's the biggest pansy our there. He ducked Loma. He even ducked tevin farmer look it up. This is a classic con job.

Tank fought Barrios, he fought Garcia, let's remember he's a natural 130-pounder, we should be looking at Navarrette and Loma as his natural rivals, along with Frank Martin. The weight thing is all screwed up and the fights in these 130-140 lbs. divisions are personal grudge matches, weight and belts are useless. Haney gets to be undisputed without fighting Loma, Lopez, Tank or Garcia - he saw a one-hit wonder in Kambosos, an unavailable Loma and he pushed Kambosos out of the way like a gnat, in two awful fights that reminded me how overrated Haney is. So Tank is in the middle of all this and he can't win for trying. Frank Martin is a combination-throwing, high IQ southpaw with the right attitude. He's only trash-talking to shut Tank up. I'd give him more of a chance if he had a bit more power, because unless you take Tank down, he's going to find a way to win. Romero, Garcia, Pit Bull Cruz, Leo Santa Cuz, Barrios -- he won differently each time. Hard to bet against him but Martin will put up a good showing I believe.

Full of one accusation which I made clearly , if you want it dumbed down just ask I didn't realise you were so confused. You Said. It's not that Tank is so good that Tank v anybody is a cherry pick. Its that Tank v anybody whom he's willing to fight is a cherry pick. I said That is a hater's phrase if I've ever seen one. It's a no-win situation vs. any opponent. Babbling. Go away and try to make a friend.

This fight is getting and deserves about as much buzz as Canelo / Ryder, probably less. Martin isn't a big puncher and last time out he had to rally late against a virtual nobody. if you're a big Tank fan, enjoy but don't expect the rest of the boxing world to fake excitement

I don't think Tank Davis has reached the level of hate like Floyd did to sell fights. He still has audiences that watch his fights to see display of skills. Even then fans want competitive fights. That's why I chuckle when they say Floyd is genius in making money. If that is the case, then his exhibition fights should at least have opponents that have a chance to beat him, thus see him lose. If not, then what's the point of buying them?

Lemme know when he stops picking his own opps like he's some top notch champ. He's a what, 8-1 fave...nah, I'm koo

What are you babbling about? I just replied to your reply. You seem full of accusations, but you might want to look up the definition of the word "phrase". It does not mean paragraph. And if the paragraph you quoted was a "haters paragraph", i dont know what to tell you. I dont see any hate in it, nor did I feel any hate when writing it. Full of one accusation which I made clearly , if you want it dumbed down just ask I didn't realise you were so confused. You Said. It's not that Tank is so good that Tank v anybody is a cherry pick. Its that Tank v anybody whom he's willing to fight is a cherry pick. I said That is a hater's phrase if I've ever seen one. It's a no-win situation vs. any opponent.

The one quoted, its obvious, why did you leave out 1/2 what I said, its the part that tells you what Im quoting. What are you babbling about? I just replied to your reply. You seem full of accusations, but you might want to look up the definition of the word "phrase". It does not mean paragraph. And if the paragraph you quoted was a "haters paragraph", i dont know what to tell you. I dont see any hate in it, nor did I feel any hate when writing it.

You copied several sentences. Which one is the "haters phrase" if you've ever seen one? The one quoted, its obvious, why did you leave out 1/2 what I said, its the part that tells you what Im quoting.

That is a hater's phrase if I've ever seen one. It's a no-win situation vs. any opponent. You copied several sentences. Which one is the "haters phrase" if you've ever seen one?

people talk about tank alrite but not so much frank martin rightly or wrongly we shall see i dont think frank has fought for a title yet so hes not on the main radar if he could pull off the upset somehow or even put in a good performance he might elevate himself quite a lot

Maybe my point wasn't obvious. Not everything comes through in forum posts. It's not that Tank is so good that Tank v anybody is a cherry pick. Its that Tank v anybody whom he's willing to fight is a cherry pick. That is a hater's phrase if I've ever seen one. It's a no-win situation vs. any opponent.

So if Tank v anyone is a cherry pick, does it matter who he fights? I am assuming you mean you will call it a cherry pick unless it’s Loma or Shakur. Is that standard the same for all? Maybe my point wasn't obvious. Not everything comes through in forum posts. It's not that Tank is so good that Tank v anybody is a cherry pick. Its that Tank v anybody whom he's willing to fight is a cherry pick. We all know that's his method. Loma is certainly an option. So were Haney and Lopez when they were there. How about Muratalla, Zepeda and a bunch of others? Cmon, you know there are some bangers. if you don't think it's true, that's okay. But all you have to do is examine his past opposition. A bunch of top guys?

Bottom line for me is that Tank v anybody is a cherry pick. So you've already seen this fight; it was just a different name instead of Martin. How does a boxing fan get excited for a fight, or even anything a particular fighter does, if he avoids big threats and there is little risk of losing? I'll watch it because it's boxing. But in a sense the whole setup is missing an element of risk and competitivesness (on the A-side) that makes boxing great. If Martin happens to shock us, then I'll be very happy for that. But, judging from his low activity, he might plan on following that same Tank Davis path with his belt too. So if Tank v anyone is a cherry pick, does it matter who he fights? I am assuming you mean you will call it a cherry pick unless it’s Loma or Shakur. Is that standard the same for all?

Because Tank is a fucking bum that is imposing rehydration clauses on everyone he fights. Another fraud like Fraud Haney who was stepping into the ting at 165 pounds at lightweight lol total fraud Americans man fuck them and their stage managed careers

I think boxing fans are focused on Usyk’s big win, the p4p debate, and Ryan’s cheating that should take away his win. After this weekend when PBC starts marketing that fight more I expect you will get more buzz. This is a good fight. Those hating on it seem to be doing so just because they don’t like Tank. This fight is much better than Loma v Kambosos or Shakur v whoever the guy he is fighting.

Bottom line for me is that Tank v anybody is a cherry pick. So you've already seen this fight; it was just a different name instead of Martin. How does a boxing fan get excited for a fight, or even anything a particular fighter does, if he avoids big threats and there is little risk of losing? I'll watch it because it's boxing. But in a sense the whole setup is missing an element of risk and competitivesness (on the A-side) that makes boxing great. If Martin happens to shock us, then I'll be very happy for that. But, judging from his low activity, he might plan on following that same Tank Davis path with his belt too.

Leonard Ellerbe sucks as a promoter. He was already talking to the media saying Frank can't beat Tank weeks or months even before the fight was yet to be made or negotiated. Promoters are supposed to promote fighters, not demote them. Otherwise, why bother making it in the first place? You're supposed to say Frank Martin is a dangerous fight for Tank even if it's not true.

You all not excited about the fight? Somewhere (you know who) have said that Tank was ducking Martin. Well, it's happening soon Frank The Ghost Martin will exactly be that ; a fughin ghost Easy to see how Tank is getting another soft touch imo