Kambozo vs Arturo Gatti at 135

Kambosos is very good if you're aggressive. He's excellent in exchanges at getting combinations off. Give him some movement or make him come on the front foot and he's useless. So there's a very clear blueprint to beat him. But if you wanna stand and exchange with him, he'll probably outland you in the exchanges, he's really good at punching between his opponents punches and landing. I was about the only person on here that said he would give Teo problems if Teo goes out looking for him too much.

Definitely was a fluke. He also beat Lee Selby in the UK and Mickey Bey in the US, both times as a road B-side underdog. He didn't look good against Haney or Hughes but it doesn't mean he sucked all along. He beat three guys in a row he wasn't supposed to beat in their home countries in Bey, Selby, and Lopez to become the unified lineal champion of the world. That's not a fluke. He's not an elite fighter but it's disrespectful to act like he's some Charles Martin level champion. He may never get another big win the rest of his career but he earned his shot at the legitimate champion and he beat him on that night. Show him some respect. As long as Lomachenko still has some gas in the tank he'll probably end Kambosos' run as a main event guy very soon anyway.

You guys overrate Kambosos too much off a 100% certified fluke win over a Teo who was not 100% physically. Dude just got his ass beat by euro level maxi. Kambo is a bum Gatti annihilates him. Definitely was a fluke.

You guys overrate Kambosos too much off a 100% certified fluke win over a Teo who was not 100% physically. Dude just got his ass beat by euro level maxi. Kambo is a bum Gatti annihilates him.