It's a simple case of money being the issue. Nothing complicated about it. Whether it's he said, she said, they said, none of that nonsense is necessary. No such thing as you can have all the facts by just scouring the current media. Who is to determine bias anyways? Only thing missing is Spence's response. Sometimes silence is just confirmation of what's being discussed. It's a forum. Everything is discussed here. Speculations, rumors, you name it.
But I don't believe James was not paid. He probably expected more. Or want extra, bonus, whatever you call it.
wait you're disputing it? there's an interview where Ryan says **** errol, it's on YouTube
you're out of the loop
I'm not disputing it, I'm saying post the actual video, not some video of someone quoting what was said.
:lol1: With all of the media resources that we have today, the best you can come up with is some he said, she said trash quoted from biased Boxing 24?
wait you're disputing it? there's an interview where Ryan says fuck errol, it's on YouTube
you're out of the loop
I mean is it really fair for trainers to demand percentage cut based on the fighter's earnings? Don't have much info to go on, but I remember GGG parting ways with Sanchez because of the percentage disagreement when Golovkin signed with DAZN.
I'm assuming Spence had the same arrangement with James as GGG/Sanchez.