Terence Crawford vs. Jaron "Boots" Ennis.

Might happen if Boots starts confronting him face to face in front of media people and youtubers.

Yeah, that much is true. They both will need an outside investor to put the money up in order for them to fight; Especially Terence Crawford. There is still no guarantee that Bud takes the fight anyhow. However If he is offered a boat load of money then perhaps the fight will be a go. - - Arum has said he's lost $$$ on Bud all through his career. Bud's a great fighter, but with the looks and personality of a dead rattlesnake, well, boxing fans just can't relate like to other big fighters, even the lovable bums.

Crawford does to Ennis what he did to Spence and ends his career.

Yes lets give Crawford great credit for beating a gatekeeper for a vacant lineal. lmao. People like you are why boxing sucks. You swallow all this fake glory so easily so fighters just look for the easy way to get it rather than actually fight top opponents. Beltran was trash. You are a casual. You should pick a different sport to watch because boxing clearly isn't for you.

The lineal championship is the only real championship. Yes lets give Crawford great credit for beating a gatekeeper for a vacant lineal. lmao. People like you are why boxing sucks. You swallow all this fake glory so easily so fighters just look for the easy way to get it rather than actually fight top opponents. Beltran was trash.

Vacant? in other words its just a meaningless title that clowns like you throw around. You probably also think beating Rolly will mean something just because he has a world title. The lineal championship is the only real championship.

The lineal title was vacant. Crawford and Beltran were ranked in the top 2 at the time by every media outlet. Thus it was for the vacant lineal/Ring/TBRB championship. . Vacant? in other words its just a meaningless title that clowns like you throw around. You probably also think beating Rolly will mean something just because he has a world title.

As an orthodox the #1 thing you shouldn’t do against Crawford is lunging in with the lead right hand with nothing set up behind it(No lead hand control, flicking jab, etc), he’ll set you up with that right hook or one-two-one counter every time. That’s how he neutralized Gamboa(watch round 5 when he caught him the first time)Brook, etc. You can’t get greedy with Crawford, you have to beat him at his own game, make the fight a stinker. The lead hand control is the key, make Crawford be the aggressor.

I know what it is. Beltran was not lineal anything. You become lineal when you beat the man who beat the man although that is also overrated. He was a journeyman, and it seems you don't know what that is. The lineal title was vacant. Crawford and Beltran were ranked in the top 2 at the time by every media outlet. Thus it was for the vacant lineal/Ring/TBRB championship. Again, you don't know what the hell you're talking about. You are a casual and a clown and you should stop posting because you're embarrassing yourself.

WTF happened to my comment.

Boots isn’t defensively responsible enough to beat Crawford. He’s flashy and has more special effects than Spence, but I’m not quite sure if he’s as effective. Crawford is very beatable to me, but it will take another special talent with similar skills and IQ to beat him. Boots looks the part, but there’s something missing from him, I’m not sure what it is.

You don't seem to even know what a lineal title is. Educate yourself. Not my job. I know what it is. Beltran was not lineal anything. You become lineal when you beat the man who beat the man although that is also overrated. He was a journeyman, and it seems you don't know what that is.

How was it a lineal title fight when Beltran just had a NABO belt? The fact he was ranked 1 just proves my point how meaningless that is because it does not change the fact he was a gatekeeper with 6 losses. Beltran won a vacant title years later vs a total bum. You are proving my points by trying to pump up a win only a journeyman with 6 losses as 'high tier'. Burns was trash also btw another british hype job. You don't seem to even know what a lineal title is. Educate yourself. Not my job.

Beltran was literally the top rated fighter available in the lightweight division at the time of the fight you clown. It was a lineal title fight and a Ring Magazine title fight. Beltran would go on to win a world title after Crawford beat him and the vast majority of people had him winning the fight with Ricky Burns where he got a draw prior to the Crawford fight. You clearly don't even watch boxing. All you can do is look up things on BoxRec and try to draw conclusions without any real context. How was it a lineal title fight when Beltran just had a NABO belt? The fact he was ranked 1 just proves my point how meaningless that is because it does not change the fact he was a gatekeeper with 6 losses. Beltran won a vacant title years later vs a total bum. You are proving my points by trying to pump up a win only a journeyman with 6 losses as 'high tier'. Burns was trash also btw another british hype job.

You listed a win over a 29-6 gate kepper Beltran a top tier win?. Postal went 3-4 since the Crawford loss. Ye real 'top tier' wins lmao. Boots is clearly a much better fighter than those guys, if you have an educated boxing eye which you clearly don't. Beltran lol! Beltran was literally the top rated fighter available in the lightweight division at the time of the fight you clown. It was a lineal title fight and a Ring Magazine title fight. Beltran would go on to win a world title after Crawford beat him and the vast majority of people had him winning the fight with Ricky Burns where he got a draw prior to the Crawford fight. You clearly don't even watch boxing. All you can do is look up things on BoxRec and try to draw conclusions without any real context.

Boots has no quality wins. Lineal titles are the only titles that matter and Crawford's wins over Beltran, Postol, and Spence respectively are all top tier wins. You have no idea what you're watching. You listed a win over a 29-6 gate kepper Beltran a top tier win?. Postal went 3-4 since the Crawford loss. Ye real 'top tier' wins lmao. Boots is clearly a much better fighter than those guys, if you have an educated boxing eye which you clearly don't. Beltran lol!

lmao 4 division lineal champion vs who? All time greats are judged by who they actually fought and beat not this paper glory which is designed to fool casuals like you. Beating a highly rated young lion like Boots would be a more impressive achievement that beating anyone at 154 for any belt imo. Boots has no quality wins. Lineal titles are the only titles that matter and Crawford's wins over Beltran, Postol, and Spence respectively are all top tier wins. You have no idea what you're watching.

lmao 4 division lineal champion vs who? All time greats are judged by who they actually fought and beat not this paper glory which is designed to fool casuals like you. Beating a highly rated young lion like Boots would be a more impressive achievement that beating anyone at 154 for any belt imo. So beating a guy who's beaten nobody himself is better than beating someone like Tszyu for a title? A guy who has actually beat some decent guys and proven to be a solid fighter himself in the process?

Crawford does everything better. Only thing that he doesn't have is youth on his side.

Unless his opponent’s name is Viktor Postol. Yeah that much is true. How old was Bud back then; 26 or 27? He did use a lot of movement in that fight.