I think there are 2 distinct groups...... "social" media and "traditional" media
I consider traditional media to be folks like Rafael, Iole, Kim, etc, regardless of the platform they are writing for. I consider them to be credible columnists, regardless if you care for their particular viewpoint or not.
Then you have the youtubers and fringe website writers, who I think just do this to get free credentials to the shows and clout chase. They are not serious media in my opinion, and promoters would be wise to just eliminate them from the conversation. They dont really add anything of value to the sport.
Prograis Does Not Have Hitchins on His Radar: You Have To Earn Your Place
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/boxing-forums/non-stop-boxing/32064766-comments-thread-for-prograis-does-not-have-hitchins-on-his-radar-you-have-to-earn-your-place#post32064973
Salute Hans for posting my interview! Check my channel out on YouTube “Cigar Talk”. Got some really cool boxers interviewing and more to come
I don't watch any of the US network news outlets like CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX News, etc. any more, if you ask me.
I live in a town house where we were given choice whether to opt for cable TV or internet. We in our household preferred cable TV because we're so used to it, but everyone voted for internet, so now we had to find a way to access what we used to have through the internet. Surprisingly, it's all there, plus more.
So I won't be surprised if cable TV will disappear forever.
2y ago
How do you define the word "media" in this internet age, and in the sport of boxing context? | BoxingScene Community