technically you may be right.
I didn’t buy the garbage, but I heard it was a nice show. You see, I saw the fix coming when Usyk was almost counted out. In order to get people to buy Usyk and Fury…this close fight had to be fixed some how. I mean this result had to happen, lmao. Here’s why:
Fury didn’t train for this fight. He did some training. Did he fight like he always does? Not even close. Where was the jab? Did he use his speed or just show it?
When Usyk went down from that clean body shot and should’ve been counted out only to be rescued by the ref…we as fans were like he can’t beat Fury. He’s too small, can’t take a body shot and stands no chance against Fury.
Fury imo used this as a chance to possibly look bad in order to get people to believe that Usyk now has a chance which will make casuals want to see this fight now. When the fight was signed before he fought NGannou…this immediately popped into my head. I just knew that there could possibly be a fix. Imo I was right.
How many of you today are thinking that if NGannou can do this…then Usyk can do this *10? How many of you are saying today that “if that was Usyk last night, he would’ve kod Fury”, lmao? All of the Fury critics and then some.
This sport hasn’t fooled me in a long time. I admit when I was younger, I didn’t know that the fix was in before some fights. I can tell now that we have the invention of the internet lmao.
No they didn’t get any ppv money from me last night. I listened to the MMA guy who commentated the fight live…and after he heard the decision that Fury won…. he called most boxing fans who said Fury won “whores of the sport”! He’s the guy who does all of the live MMA fights on YouTube. He kept saying that boxing decisions are worse than MMA, lmao. Like MMA doesn’t have fixed decisions lol.
It was funny to see upset MMA fans coming out of the wood works who hated NGannou now clinging to him that we have done something bigger than what Mercer did to Sylvia lmao…. We have our equalizer!!!
It is fun to read all of the comments all over social media that NGannou won, but all I saw was a fix…and I knew that we’d get Usyk/Fury all along.
If you bet that if would go to a decision you won. If you bet that he’d knock down Fury, you cashed in. If you bet that NGannou would win…you’re a sucker lol… :rofl::rofl::rofl:
In future it won't be possible to dismiss mma fighters. In the past mma guys were just seen as boxers who couldn't cut it in boxingso jumped on mma bandwagon
I'd like to think so, but unfortunately probably not. It'll be some combination of Fury is shyt/had a bad night, Ngannou is a one in a million case etc etc repeated until this blows over.
Fury won fight, but Fury made Francis look like an elite. A MMA man made a elite boxer look like a novice. So Francis can never be seen as a loser, MMA and franvis won.
In future it won't be possible to dismiss mma fighters. In the past mma guys were just seen as boxers who couldn't cut it in boxing so jumped on mma bandwagon
An MMA guy was bound to eventually beat or look good vs a boxer
Ironic an MMA guy looked good vs ''the best HW that ever lived'' :lol1:
Fury won fight, but Fury made Francis look like an elite. A MMA man made a elite boxer look like a novice. So Francis can never be seen as a loser, MMA and franvis won.
In future it won't be possible to dismiss mma fighters. In the past mma guys were just seen as boxers who couldn't cut it in boxing so jumped on mma bandwagon
I've got dan-b on ignore, but why do these lefties insist on inserting their politics into everything? If you want to slag off Andrew Tate and the alt-right, go to reddit. This is a boxing forum.
Anyway, it was a terrible performance but Fury can't be wrote completely off just yet.
My problem with Fury is that he hasn't fought a proper heavyweight campaign akin to what we're used to. It's inevitable people will examine him as an individual to find out why that may be. Personality wise I find him dull, but I say the same about most people from the sports and entertainment industry. I actually find most interviews with these people awkward to watch and I tend to avoid it. I don't look to film "stars" or elite athletes for intellectual stimulation.
Fury hasn't happened in a vacuum, he's a product of this social media driven edgelord grifter culture. Andrew Tate, an ugly, uninteresting, loud mouth, who repackaged some alt-right/manosphere talking points became the most famous person in the world. He managed to get a lot of discontented young males thinking he was some profound visionary because he spoke with loud "confidence" (obnoxiousness).
That's not to say Fury doesn't have genuine boxing talent, but strip away the hype and you're left with a semi-active, ungainly looking man who hasn't fought many of his peers in the heavyweight division. I fail to see what's impressive about this.
Fury was definitely overhyped and has a weak resume, but hes not the only one. Most of the current top 10 have barely fought anyone. Out of the current crop Joshua is the only guy who has beat a decent number of notable opponents, but he also lacks a really strong signature win over a highly rated prime opponent, and has losses too.
I avoid accusing someone of being a hard fan or a hater, it's idiotic (as nobody is obliged to like or dislike some person or whatever). The only problem is the way people comment and exchange. I can also agree the "nuthuggers" are less likely to be honest, but I also think "the haters" are less likely to be objective and capable of seeing some details. In the end, this is just a sport and those are just some athletes who don't care about us, regardless of what they say.
In most cases, a so called fight fan will expose themselves as such.
TBF, it is perfectly normal to hate/''love'' an athlete, celeb, musician more/less than others.
People have preferences.
Some people like brawlers more than slicksters
It becomes a problem when a fan sees shlt that never happened or become hypocritical.
Case in point;
RESUMES
We all know a shltty resume when we see one.
Haters/huggers will expose themselves within seconds in this regard
BTW, no entertainer/athlete loves their fans except Dolly FKN Parton :usa2:
I avoid accusing someone of being a hard fan or a hater, it's idiotic (as nobody is obliged to like or dislike some person or whatever). The only problem is the way people comment and exchange. I can also agree the "nuthuggers" are less likely to be honest, but I also think "the haters" are less likely to be objective and capable of seeing some details. In the end, this is just a sport and those are just some athletes who don't care about us, regardless of what they say.
In most cases, a so called fight fan will expose themselves as such.
TBF, it is perfectly normal to hate/''love'' an athlete, celeb, musician more/less than others.
People have preferences.
Some people like brawlers more than slicksters
It becomes a problem when a fan sees shlt that never happened or become hypocritical.
Case in point;
RESUMES
We all know a shltty resume when we see one.
Haters/huggers will expose themselves within seconds in this regard :lol1:
In some instances, it's hard not to hate a fighter. Fury being a prime example.
I am a certified Fury hater.
I only wish I can shrink him down 4''s just to prove he isn't as good as his nuthuggers say he is.
He is supremely fortunate this HW era is so abysmal.
That being said, I am fully capable of being honest.
He is a better, smarter boxer than Wilder (big whoop) and should have won all 3.
IMHO, nuthuggers are less likely to be HONEST than a hater.
I avoid accusing someone of being a hard fan or a hater, it's idiotic (as nobody is obliged to like or dislike some person or whatever). The only problem is the way people comment and exchange. I can also agree the "nuthuggers" are less likely to be honest, but I also think "the haters" are less likely to be objective and capable of seeing some details. In the end, this is just a sport and those are just some athletes who don't care about us, regardless of what they say.
The opposite of a "nut hugger".
In some instances, it's hard not to hate a fighter. Fury being a prime example.
I am a certified Fury hater.
I only wish I can shrink him down 4''s just to prove he isn't as good as his nuthuggers say he is.
He is supremely fortunate this HW era is so abysmal.
That being said, I am fully capable of being honest.
He is a better, smarter boxer than Wilder (big whoop) and should have won all 3.
IMHO, nuthuggers are less likely to be HONEST than a hater.
I think most people fall somewhere in between, it's just the two extremes are overrepresented online as they are most inclined to make themselves known. A good example is Twitter, where literally, statistically, most people who use it don't even 'like' Tweets because they're public actions. So what you're left with is two extremes hollering at each other, many of whom probably have mental health problems of varying kinds.
What's missing too often is a proper understanding of one's arguments. If you say something pro or against anyone, it doesn't necessarily mean you stand 100% behind or against him, but you try to show things aren't just black and white in life. Plus, people tend to forget if one has done something good/great before and get him for what he currently is.
Most of all, I don't get that emotional investment in somebody or against him. It's just a sport and most of all, it should matter what they show in the ring, for the sake of boxing and in case one is a practitioner - to probably learn something. What they do outside of the ring is something we should pay less attention to, because it's been enough decades people get involved in bull*hit spectacle of someone. But what about if he avoids another opponent - well, it's for him (and brings nothing to people, just as his success doesn't), history will look back at the actions and may probably judge it better than us who are witnessing it.
Along with a good 90 percent of logical neutral boxing fans
Which in reality is 90% of his haters. But I love it when one has nothing more, but to speak for other people.
I think fury won despite the knockdown, but it was very close. Francis did not show any separation and was getting hit by 1-2 all night. Sure, fury did not hurt him, but he was getting hit nonetheless. If there is a rematch, fury would take it more seriously and would win by a wider margin. I feel that fury was a little too anxious, reckless and was rushing his work.
If nothing else, it was a moral and financial victory (the latter being more important).
Seeing how this is the most decrepit HW era EVER, things like this are bound to happen :lol1:
Couldn't have happened to a more overhyped HW.