So, after nearly a year of moaning, puking and whining from Benn and Hearn, why all the silence about the decision that brought the UKAD "investigation" to an end?
What actually were the "findings"?
Where the samples "contaminated" or was the banned substance actually in Benn's system?
Didn't the same thing happen with Whyte and one of his failed drug tests? Was it against Rivas? Don't speak on it long enough and it'll go away.
That definitely seems to be tactic Benn and Hearn are adopting.
Didn't the same thing happen with Whyte and one of his failed drug tests? Was it against Rivas? Don't speak on it long enough and it'll go away. For a while, I was emailing UKAD constantly about Whyte, hoping to piss someone off.