Keep lying ghostof. Its what you do. First you defended it by saying you do it because Larry does it.
Then you said you did it because me and others didnt call out Chollo and Larry.
Now its you dont do it, except for hot current event topics-which in your case always happen to be anti black or anti liberal.
Like I said - when you post yes it is. The reason is above.
I post current event threads that you and your tag-alongs love to post on. You post on them more than anyone else. If you weren’t interested you would just ignore them. We all know who and what you are, and it was this way long before I ever started posting here. Clowns like you, travesty, and Larry are race obsessed mouth breathers who live in an alternate reality.
That's a lie, the only "race threads" I ever started were hot current event topics in the news. Most of my threads have nothing to do with race, but you make sure to insert race into almost every thread, whether it's in the lounge, NSB, or the Dome. It's always about race and MAGA with you. Sad.
Keep lying ghostof. Its what you do. First you defended it by saying you do it because Larry does it.
Then you said you did it because me and others didnt call out Chollo and Larry.
Now its you dont do it, except for hot current event topics-which in your case always happen to be anti black or anti liberal.
Like I said - when you post yes it is. The reason is above.
Lying about it and pivoting to something unrelated isnt calling out hypocrisy.
If you start the thread or post, 99% of the time its race related. I guess you need to pretend otherwise.
That's a lie, the only "race threads" I ever started were hot current event topics in the news. Most of my threads have nothing to do with race, but you make sure to insert race into almost every thread, whether it's in the lounge, NSB, or the Dome. It's always about race and MAGA with you. Sad.
It's not pivoting when I point out your hypocrisy. Pivoting is when you make every thread about some race bullshyt.
Lying about it and pivoting to something unrelated isnt calling out hypocrisy.
If you start the thread or post, 99% of the time its race related. I guess you need to pretend otherwise.
Pivoting to something that Has nothing to do with this discussion.
Dude stop the incessant lying. All of us dont agree on close fights. I have not said majority opinions do jot matter.
Sometimes I agree- manny v bradley, kovalev v ward,
and sometimes I dont- loma v haney, floyd v castillo. Just like everyone else.
It's not pivoting when I point out your hypocrisy. Pivoting is when you make every thread about some race bullshyt.
Really? Because any time the talks of robbery come up regarding Floyd's questionable wins or any PBC fighter's wins you are quick to shoot it down and insist the opinions of a majority of fans doesn't matter.
Pivoting to something that Has nothing to do with this discussion.
Dude stop the incessant lying. All of us dont agree on close fights. I have not said majority opinions do jot matter.
Sometimes I agree- manny v bradley, kovalev v ward,
and sometimes I dont- loma v haney, floyd v castillo. Just like everyone else.
Ok. Well they both beat the 2 best in the eyes of the majority of fans.
Really? Because any time the talks of robbery come up regarding Floyd's questionable wins or any PBC fighter's wins you are quick to shoot it down and insist the opinions of a majority of fans doesn't matter.
Yes. I agree I am in the minority on that. I agree with that as well.
The thing with Teo v Taylor is the majority of fans felt both lost. It felt like Bob put them in the ring because they earn more, not because they deserved it.
I think the fact it didnt crack 1mil viewers despite being on ESPN reflects this.
The majority of fans feel Loma beat Haney is he the best at 135?
PBC is always expected to do more because it's got the largest stable. What needs to happen in this sport is let this era pass and hope for new breed of fighters to appear who are hungry for activity, not part-time boxers who choose to sit around even when plenty of fights in their stable are available. PBC promoted this culture of part-time boxing.
I answered it already- Martin and Catterall, the 2 guys that most fans felt beat them in their last fights. There is no way you missed that.
Ok. Ive made similar points long before this.
LOL, no cares about that fight and they aren't the two best at 140.
So you would have preferred Sandor Martin vs. Jack Catterall over Josh Taylor vs. Teofimo Lopez? Because I think you're in the minority there.
Looking bad in one fight doesn't erase all their previous wins, it's just one fight.
Yes. I agree I am in the minority on that. I agree with that as well.
The thing with Teo v Taylor is the majority of fans felt both lost. It felt like Bob put them in the ring because they earn more, not because they deserved it.
I think the fact it didnt crack 1mil viewers despite being on ESPN reflects this.
I answered it already- Martin and Catterall, the 2 guys that most fans felt beat them in their last fights. There is no way you missed that.
So you would have preferred Sandor Martin vs. Jack Catterall over Josh Taylor vs. Teofimo Lopez? Because I think you're in the minority there.
Looking bad in one fight doesn't erase all their previous wins, it's just one fight.
Taylor and Teo were considered the two best at 140, if not then who was? You keep ducking the question.
Crawford beat Porter way more decisively than Spence and was already an undisputed champion. Spence’s best win was Danny Garcia, who ducked Crawford.
I answered it already- Martin and Catterall, the 2 guys that most fans felt beat them in their last fights. There is no way you missed that.
Ok. Ive made similar points long before this.
So TR are putting out promotions for the fight, and it’s on ESPN, while PBC make zero mention for the fight (as they do with everything non-pbc, while ESPN and DAZN for some reason promote their fighter’s). And yet you give PBC credit for that and not TR?
This is like the comparative rd’s. Since it’s so rare for PBC, when they seem to do something good, it’s apparently amazing.
Did you see me give PBC credit for it it? I could if I wanted to but I didn't and you still cried to me about them. Ohashi and TGB made the fight. Top Rank are Inoue's American promoter but aside from carrying the fight they had no involvement.
Usyk is with K2 and Bivol has one fight left with Matchroom.
Usyk is with the Saudi company skills challenge now.
Bad idea too in my opinion. Letting them put single events on is ok, but signing multi fight deals with them is not good.
They always move the goalposts. They're the ones saying they were putting on AJ v Wilder in december and now they're saying they can't do it until next year. They also couldn't host Fury v Usyk earlier this year because they promised a stadium and couldn't deliver it. Now they're saying to Usyk he won't be fighting until next spring after this month.
I can see fighters signing long deals with them ending up frustrated because they won't be active. Good luck trying to get out of a Saudi contract..
they're only interested in mega events, which limits your choice of opponents to a tiny amount. So I don't really see fighters signing with them on longer deals being able to fight regularly.
It did get made without Arum.
So TR are putting out promotions for the fight, and it’s on ESPN, while PBC make zero mention for the fight (as they do with everything non-pbc, while ESPN and DAZN for some reason promote their fighter’s). And yet you give PBC credit for that and not TR?
This is like the comparative rd’s. Since it’s so rare for PBC, when they seem to do something good, it’s apparently amazing.