Espn's Mike Coppinger blocked from covering Spence-Crawford

Haven’t seen any further explanation of this from Mike Coppinger or anybody else so I have to take back what I said. I wasn’t wrong to assume a racial angle from the PBC side given some of the things that go on over there, like Deontay Wilder giving exclusive interviews to the toxic 78sportstv. But I was wrong to say that this is what happened with Coppinger without any proof and to state it is if it were a fact. Are you going to publicly apologise for baselessly asserting that Mike Coppinger was removed due to not being black or are you going to continue to be the spineless weasel that you've shown us all to be?

Haven’t seen any further explanation of this from Mike Coppinger or anybody else so I have to take back what I said. I wasn’t wrong to assume a racial angle from the PBC side given some of the things that go on over there, like Deontay Wilder giving exclusive interviews to the toxic 78sportstv. But I was wrong to say that this is what happened with Coppinger without any proof and to state it is if it were a fact.

You can’t just make a reason up and pass it as truth. That’s called a lie. That’s like me saying I think you’re clueless on boxing because you’re gay. I have no idea if you’re gay or not, even if you’ve given me a reason to think you are. I can’t just assert that the reason is because you’re gay. The same way you can’t just assert that Coppinger was removed because of his race. You can’t do that, it’s disingenuous. You were wrong, you LIED, and if you had anything about you would apologise. Will you? Or will you continue to be the weasel you are? Lol IronDan on his head!

That was my reason for why Coppinger’s credential might have been denied. I didn’t lie, I was just wrong. (Pending a possible explanation from Coppinger.) Going by PBC’s history (which joseph5620 just said is ok to use) it wasn’t a completely baseless assumption to make. There is no history. PBC had never banned anyone for being white. The fact that you keep repeating a lie shows how slimy you are. Your original post never used the word "might." Just more lies from you.

That was my reason for why Coppinger’s credential might have been denied. I didn’t lie, I was just wrong. (Pending a possible explanation from Coppinger.) Going by PBC’s history (which joseph5620 just said is ok to use) it wasn’t a completely baseless assumption to make. You can’t just make a reason up and pass it as truth. That’s called a lie. That’s like me saying I think you’re clueless on boxing because you’re gay. I have no idea if you’re gay or not, even if you’ve given me a reason to think you are. I can’t just assert that the reason is because you’re gay. The same way you can’t just assert that Coppinger was removed because of his race. You can’t do that, it’s disingenuous. You were wrong, you LIED, and if you had anything about you would apologise. Will you? Or will you continue to be the weasel you are?

You literally lied :lol1: You said his credential was removed because he’s not black. That is literally baseless and a lie. You need to invest in the Oxford dictionary and learn what words mean. That was my reason for why Coppinger’s credential might have been denied. I didn’t lie, I was just wrong. (Pending a possible explanation from Coppinger.) Going by PBC’s history (which joseph5620 just said is ok to use) it wasn’t a completely baseless assumption to make.

Exposed for him catching me on a technicality, that didn’t disprove the overall main point that race wasn’t involved either forwards or backwards when Atlas was fired? According to Teddy himself? So why would I blame race in that instance like I did here with PBC? PBC has a history which you just said is ok to use as proof. So it wasn’t totally baseless on my part to say what I did, under your definition. Technicality? :lol1: Do you know what a technicality is? I don’t think you do. Are you going to apologise for lying about the reason why Mike Coppinger had his credential removed? Or are you going to continue to be the spineless coward that you are?

i didn’t lie. Just gave my reason for why Coppinger’s credential might have been denied. Giving PBC’s history it wasn’t a baseless thing to say. You literally lied :lol1: You said his credential was removed because he’s not black. That is literally baseless and a lie. You need to invest in the Oxford dictionary and learn what words mean.

Exposed because you flat out lied about why Coppinger's credential's were denied. You said it was because he's white. Nice try but nobody is buying your bullshlt spin of the narrative. You're a liar, a coward, and a clown with an anti-black agenda. It's clear for everyone to see. i didn’t lie. Just gave my reason for why Coppinger’s credential might have been denied. Giving PBC’s history it wasn’t a baseless thing to say.

Exposed for him catching me on a technicality, that didn’t disprove the overall main point that race wasn’t involved either forwards or backwards when Atlas was fired? According to Teddy himself? So why would I blame race in that instance like I did here with PBC? PBC has a history which you just said is ok to use as proof. So it wasn’t totally baseless on my part to say what I did, under your definition. Exposed because you flat out lied about why Coppinger's credential's were denied. You said it was because he's white. Nice try but nobody is buying your bullshlt spin of the narrative. You're a liar, a coward, and a clown with an anti-black agenda. It's clear for everyone to see.

Stay out of this conversation. You've already been exposed as a phony, a coward, and a liar with an anti-black agenda. There is no coming back from that for you. Try your anti- black agenda somewhere it might work. You're cooked in here. Exposed for him catching me on a technicality, that didn’t disprove the overall main point that race wasn’t involved either forwards or backwards when Atlas was fired? According to Teddy himself? So why would I blame race in that instance like I did here with PBC? PBC has a history which you just said is ok to use as proof. So it wasn’t totally baseless on my part to say what I did, under your definition.

Is this going to be your definition of proof going forward then? Eddie Hearn https://twitter.com/BenyaminFarooqi/...42783593435136 Mayweather https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CU9SDSCViM Canelo I don't even agree I'm still negotiating don't lie to people the day everything is signed that day I'll let them know for now there's nothing concrete. https://twitter.com/MikeCoppinger/st...25902125948935 All have called our Coppinger for the same reasons. Are they all lying on Mike Coppinger? I have a lot more too.

So if there is a history of racial preferences on the PBC side that would count too, right? Stay out of this conversation. You've already been exposed as a phony, a coward, and a liar with an anti-black agenda. There is no coming back from that for you. Try your anti- black agenda somewhere it might work. You're cooked in here.

When someone has a history of it, yes. Unless you believe the multiple sources that have comfirmed his inaccurate reporting are lying. Is that what you're saying? So if there is a history of racial preferences on the PBC side that would count too, right?

Is this going to be your definition of proof going forward then? When someone has a history of it, yes. Unless you believe the multiple sources that have comfirmed his inaccurate reporting are lying. Is that what you're saying?

Your point was that there is no proof that Coppinger reported something inaccurate when there clearly is. He has a history of it, he's been fired, and PBC blocked his credentials. Is this going to be your definition of proof going forward then?

I've already made my point and it stands. If I'd said or implied anything to do with race I'm certain you would have ferreted that out by now. Thanks, I guess, for not inventing something. Your point was that there is no proof that Coppinger reported something inaccurate when there clearly is. He has a history of it, he's been fired, and PBC blocked his credentials. Bur I'm sure you believe the multiple sources calling Coppinger out are lying.

Yes and none one of that has anything to do with race if that's what you're trying to support with slick talk. Also, it's not like Coppinger doesn't have a history of reporting inaccurate information and not just with PBC. From Canelo: I don't even agree I'm still negotiating don't lie to people the day everything is signed that day I'll let them know for now there's nothing concrete. https://twitter.com/MikeCoppinger/st...25902125948935 Anything else or are you done with whatever point you were trying to make? I've already made my point and it stands. If I'd said or implied anything to do with race I'm certain you would have ferreted that out by now. Thanks, I guess, for not inventing something.

So maybe his statements were not inaccurate then, or maybe they were. Maybe a journalist said something true that PBC didn't like and refused to compromise his integrity with a retraction...or not. All I'm saying is that PBC's motivation is unknown without an actual explanation of the particulars. Yes and none one of that has anything to do with race if that's what you're trying to support with slick talk. Also, it's not like Coppinger doesn't have a history of reporting inaccurate information and not just with PBC. From Canelo: I don't even agree I'm still negotiating don't lie to people the day everything is signed that day I'll let them know for now there's nothing concrete. https://twitter.com/MikeCoppinger/st...25902125948935 Anything else or are you done with whatever point you were trying to make?

It's between PBC and Coppinger. It's not our responsibility to know. I'm sure if you ask someone from PBC with knowledge of this they could tell you. So maybe his statements were not inaccurate then, or maybe they were. Maybe a journalist said something true that PBC didn't like and refused to compromise his integrity with a retraction...or not. All I'm saying is that PBC's motivation is unknown without an actual explanation of the particulars.