This is a genuine question. If Spence beats Bud does he have a better run at Welterweight than Floyd?
Brook, Porter, Danny, Ugas, Bud + undisputed. Cleaned out the entire division. Could’ve had Thurman but he ducked. And the Pac fight got cancelled. So it’s tight.
Any top WW who wants to he taken seriously and be a HOF WW, who only fought at WW, and whose majority of fights were at WW, should absolutely aim to have a better resume than Mayweather at WW. Bare minimum.
Why? Mayweather had 34 fights under 147, and 16 at 147 and above. That’s 68% of his career taking place below 147.
That’s equal to Spence moving up to 160-168 and fighting there until 40 years old, beating top 10 fighters up there, staying undefeated.
That's a good point.
You'd expect a career WW who's P4P fighter to have a better record than a guy who was there for his 4th weight class.
But even still, Floyd's is better I'd say.
Any top WW who wants to he taken seriously and be a HOF WW, who only fought at WW, and whose majority of fights were at WW, should absolutely aim to have a better resume than Mayweather at WW. Bare minimum.
Why? Mayweather had 34 fights under 147, and 16 at 147 and above. That’s 68% of his career taking place below 147.
That’s equal to Spence moving up to 160-168 and fighting there until 40 years old, beating top 10 fighters up there, staying undefeated.
Floyd as great as he is, hasn’t fought anyone at the same level as current Spence and Crawford at welterweight.
Pac was only 35 when he fought him, but clearly lost a step already, has been planked few fights ago and hasn’t had a KO in like 6 years.
Crawford still at his peak, no extreme wear and tear and no losses and Spence at 33 is also on top of his game.
Maybe prime Hatton? But that dude ain’t beating Spence or Crawford.
So yep, spence would be a greater ATG welterweight than floyd. Wouldn’t necessarily mean he’d beat Floyd.
Agreed. Not saying he’d be a greater P4P fighter overall than Floyd. But as a Welter ATG? Yes.
Guess you’re done crying. Go snivel to someone else. You’re too emotional. Maybe if you got that sex change you’d be a happier person.
*Hates on 7 fighters in less than 48 hours*
*Calls other people emotional* :rolleyes:.
This is a genuine question. If Spence beats Bud does he have a better run at Welterweight than Floyd?
Brook, Porter, Danny, Ugas, Bud + undisputed. Cleaned out the entire division. Could’ve had Thurman but he ducked. And the Pac fight got cancelled. So it’s tight.
Floyd as great as he is, hasn’t fought anyone at the same level as current Spence and Crawford at welterweight.
Pac was only 35 when he fought him, but clearly lost a step already, has been planked few fights ago and hasn’t had a KO in like 6 years.
Crawford still at his peak, no extreme wear and tear and no losses and Spence at 33 is also on top of his game.
Maybe prime Hatton? But that dude ain’t beating Spence or Crawford.
So yep, spence would be a greater ATG welterweight than floyd. Wouldn’t necessarily mean he’d beat Floyd.
It's criticized because people around the globe think he cherrypicked you don't end your career fighting a c fighter like Andre Berto if you don't want to be criticized that was on him he steered his whole welterweight run stop making excuses
Where did I make any excuses?
Why is Floyd held to totally different standards than anyone else? I mean I have literally never ever heard another fighter be criticised for the opponent selection of their last fight.
Did anyone criticise Holmes for fighting Butterbean in his last fight?
Just about every great fighter in history went out facing a soft touch. Its very common for fighters to retire on a soft touch in their hometown.
And the thing is most of Buds WW opponents are actually worse than Berto lol, straight up.
Floyd's WW resume isn't all that. Pace got better resume than floyd
Huh? He beat Manny at ww. Manny doesnt have any win as good.
Manny also lost multiple times at ww to really low quality boxers.
This is a genuine question. If Spence beats Bud does he have a better run at Welterweight than Floyd?
Brook, Porter, Danny, Ugas, Bud + undisputed. Cleaned out the entire division. Could’ve had Thurman but he ducked. And the Pac fight got cancelled. So it’s tight.
He didnt duck Thurman.
Volume wise-Spence has more than double the ww wins as Floyd. While imo Floyd has more quality wins- Zab, Shane, Hatton. Manny, Maidana 2x, JMM- if Spence has the volume, undisputed and a win over Bud would make it him by a slight bit.
Floyd’s welterweight resume is terrible. What prime undefeated fighters did he beat? Great skills but resume is just not there. Everyone he fought outside Maidana was coming off multiple stoppage losses. Facts not feelings.
If Crawford beats Spence in a clear and methodical way, could it mean the guys he fought were just a tad average and overrated, and Errol's resume was really not something to brag about?
It would mean they were all good but Crawford is that guy.
n!gga who, who, skull cracked brook, retirement Porter, who, who, Spence
Floyd mayweather's WW run consisted of mainly lightweights moving up and alot of who's, neither he nor Pacquiao fought a great natural welterweight.
I think it says a lot though when people criticise Floyds resume yet here we are comparing career long WWs, supposedly the best of this era and will have cleared the division out to just Floyds WW run, his fourth weight class and not even his best weight and he still has a good argument for having a better resume at the weight.
It's criticized because people around the globe think he cherrypicked you don't end your career fighting a c fighter like Andre Berto if you don't want to be criticized that was on him he steered his whole welterweight run stop making excuses
Hatton isn't Floyds best win at WW his only win at the weight was Collazo and many felt he lost that fight.
Say what who was more prime and undefeated than Hatton when those two sqared off don't say that c fighter Marcos Madonna
Hatton isn't Floyds best win at WW his only win at the weight was Collazo and many felt he lost that fight.
Stop talking like casual social media, youre supposed to be a long term boxing fan and you still don't understand weight, what weight was Hatton vs Collazo, what weight was Hatton vs KT what weight was Hatton vs Floyd, fight night weights?
I think it says a lot though when people criticise Floyds resume yet here we are comparing career long WWs, supposedly the best of this era and will have cleared the division out to just Floyds WW run, his fourth weight class and not even his best weight and he still has a good argument for having a better resume at the weight.
Absolutely the best guy Floyd beat at welterweight was prime unbeaten Hatton whoever wins this trumps anything Floyd did at welterweight
Hatton isn't Floyds best win at WW his only win at the weight was Collazo and many felt he lost that fight.
It’s not nice to talk about yourself like that. Sure.. Pac didn’t turn down drug testing because he was ‘afraid of needles’ & Shane Mosley didn’t avoid Floyd and try to blame it on his tooth LOL.
I’ve seen you attack Shakur, Haney, Spence, Floyd & Crawford all in 48 hours, I mean it’s pretty clear what you are. Get some fresh air and some help.
Guess you’re done crying. Go snivel to someone else. You’re too emotional. Maybe if you got that sex change you’d be a happier person.
2y ago
If Spence beats Bud does he have a better run at Welter than Floyd? | BoxingScene Community