Losing 3 belts to Bivol
PROS:
- still left with 1 belt, the corrupt WBC belt
CONS:
- losing to a "drained" Bivol is somewhat humiliating
- still have to defend his WBC belt against his mandatory, Benavidez
Losing 4 belts to Benavidez
PROS:
- none i can think of
CONS:
- another boxer beating him further lower his stocks
Losing to Benevidez, he would undoubtedly have a rematch clause. He would have already played that card with Bivol. If Bivol beats him handily again, he's fcked.
That said, I think Canelo beats Benevidez the first time. For real I mean, without questionable scorecards.
Losing 3 to Bivol at 168 imo. Cause hed still have 1 ILLEGITIMATE belt which would be a fcuking joke!
Losing to Benavidez wouldnt be as bad imo cause at least it wouod be a passing of the torch. Still would be funny af though
Losing 3 belts to Bivol
PROS:
- still left with 1 belt, the corrupt WBC belt
CONS:
- losing to a "drained" Bivol is somewhat humiliating
- still have to defend his WBC belt against his mandatory, Benavidez
Losing 4 belts to Benavidez
PROS:
- none i can think of
CONS:
- another boxer beating him further lower his stocks
- - I'd say listening to an ijit like you would dumb his IQ down so far he couldn't pass a physical for drooling...