Who "robbery" was worse: Rolly or Haney?

That Barroso robbery was one of the wildest things I've ever seen.

Rollie fight and it isn't even close

Ref incorrectly stopping the fight is different but worse than bad judging imo

Rolly for sure. But I guess Barroso doesn’t have the right complexion for the protection.

A fight with a bunch of swing rounds isn't a robbery. A fight where the A-side fighter is protected by the ref IS a robbery. See: Chavez/Taylor I

Barroso. I thought Loma won his fight, but wouldn’t lose sleep giving the W to Haney. It was close. Barroso got a stoppage thrown his way for NO REASON. I’m still irked over that one. I wanted that old man to win. He at least gets a moral victory for his humiliation of Rolly, at least.

Everything about the Rolly fight was suspect, from Rolly even being in it at all, being unranked at 140 and coming from a KO loss at 135, to the questionable stoppage. Was pretty obvious he was losing that fight. I've got all kinds of questions about the Loma fight since Top Rank was acting like Haney was the winner before the fight, but the Rolly fight was as blatant as it gets.

The whole Rolly fight stunk to high heaven. He was getting a shot at the title and the champ pops dirty. Not only they stripped the champ but they keep the fight and go with the guy that should had fought for the title in the first place, he had been the #1 guy for a while. Rolly was getting beaten up, was behind on the score cards and when he pushed Barroso down they counted it like a knock down. The first instance they saw that they could stop the fight they did. Tony Weeks refused to speak after the fight.

Barroso got screwed the hardest. At 63 years old, he just won't be getting many more shots like that. I can see that!

Barroso got screwed way harder because you could tell Weeks was looking for the first chance to rescue Rolly. Visually it was so much worse.